BTW, even the countries that HAVE banned it, guess what. Books with child sex in them are still legal

Cause it seems to be just to much work.

pornography itself provides no benefit that could possibly out-weight the almost non existent benefit

it is like a rat

who presses a button to get cocain

pure indulgence

Who are you to say they can't Indulge? Why do you or anyone have the right to step on someones personal freedom to partake of porn?

Or Weed for that matter?

Where have i said i want porn banned?

or can you not read

Weed is different in one way; you can end up harming someone in certain circumstances

Such as driving while under the influence

Your words only lead towards a "Ban"

But that's a matter of regulation

something can provide no benefit and be not illegal

Because it is "Against the traditions"!

but you are projecting other arguments onto me

IT IS JUST INDULGENCE AND INDULGENCE IS A SIN

Your words lead to ban

lol

Based on your previous arguements

lol how does pornography benefit society?

Look, when you're - for example - calling something pedophilia

please inform me

The implication is it should be banned

Likewise with your arguments since

muh implication

Implication is an actual thing

and your implication is the normalization of pedophilia

That it's overused by people who don't know the definition doesn't change that.

sooooooooo

My argument literally hinged on the fact that lolis _don't_ normalize it

You really see only black and white

soooooooooooooo

is it just used to put words in some elses mouth

So implication isn't a real thing

K

i can just say implication and

poof that is someones arguement

Or you can look at an implication

An actual implication