Message from @OtaRev
Discord ID: 463575498220371969
And Montreal has been taking them in for 'asylum'.
Can you imagine if the USA is actually able to scale down the defense spending?
I thoroughly agree, Canada is nothing but a leech on America.
How much surplus money they'd have.
Which is why I welcome annexation.
Glass the middle east and NK, let the civilized world defend themselves with their own money.
2 days of military activity in the middle east is enough to pay for the entire Apollo space program.
Fuck, the USA could have the 51st state to be in SPAAAAACE.
America has 1.5 million more tons of ships than RU/China combined.
It literally protects the entirety of the oceans.
If everyone else in the world combined forces, it would be roughly equivalent in tonnage to the US naval fleet.
Not a joke.
Image if the USA invaded Mexico, destroyed thed cartels and tried to stanles the country and economy? It might be cheaper longer term than a wall if we got rid of the reason illegals wanted to leave Mexico in the first place. We need to clean up our neighborhood before worrying about the rest of the world.
No, not acceptable.
Don't need another Iraq.
Respect sovereignty.
It's entirely their problem, and the wall is fixing our problem.
Not if they try to flood our country
W A L L
I respect the thought behind the wall. Something needs to be done for border security. I am just not sure a wall is the most effective way to spend our money to that end.
You can't force-feed freedom and prosperity into a shithole.
Wall vs Continuous hemmoraging of border security funding for remote parts of the desert.
They just elected a fucking commie, that's in bed with drug cartels.
Walls do require upkeep, not to mention there is the debate ineffectiveness.
The cartels already employ tunnels to sneak across
It's effective though.
"the debate ineffectiveness." There's no debate, except form people who want open borders.
It's extremely effective, by like, 95% if various articles are to be believed.
Everywhere where a wall was used to secure the border, or even just a fence, it has worked.
I really think the wall needs to be more metaphorical than literal. Put enough active pressure on the cartels and they will either back off or escalate matters
To debate the effectiveness of a wall is ridiculous
How would a metaphorical wall stop them?
By metaphorical i mean patrols
So you don't think the cartels won't tunnel under?
Active measures
That's even more expensive.
.... WE HAVE THAT
And yes, we increased funding.
Its currently hobbled tho
Tunneling, or climbing over it, it's slower, riskier.
why not just have a wall of artillery fire?