He makes very few arguments that are worth listening to, and his audience seems to be mostly people who want to watch him "pwn" people with even worse arguments than he himself brings to the table, namely SJW's and similar people.

He's incredibly entertaining when he actually brings something of value to the table. He does so rarely.

shapiro is the normiest of normie content

the amount of shapiro owns sjw compilations I've been sent by politically illiterate normies is staggering

The godly emperor ben shapiro totally destroys a sjw libtard in an EPIC, DESTRUCTIVE fashion ANNIHILATING him in seconds

For once I agree with the socdem

This cannot be

But yeah, Shapiro is the most overrated political thing on YouTube

Well

Its microseconds

You know how fast he talks, right?

The party called ”Vänstern” (left side) had their partytalk dedicated to shittalk SD. Lmao.

that's how you win votes!

fling that dirt, so easy

addressing relevant issues? Hah!

The party members look exactly like how you would guess

It's rare for Shapiro to bring up his jewness into an argument.

I've seen him take on quite a few large leftist politicians before. He's definitely not bad. He's also incredibly smart. Cum Laude at Harvard and been on TV for his violin playing at like 12.

Don't agree with him on everything, but yeah.

Obviously he's going to have a bias to Israel.

Ben also thinks like a trad theist, he's stated in the past that he thinks atheistic or agnostic people are more likely to be immoral simply because of their lack of faith<:thronk:441701565607444482>

I mean, it's not entirely unfounded. It's easier to lie to yourself than it is to lie to someone else, more or less.

When you feel like you can't steal because a god is always watching rather than if you steal and don't get caught, then you're without punishment.

Whereas if you have those types of belief systems, if you steal, caught or not, you're always caught.

So I can see the logic in that statement.

yeah ben is a cuck.<:pepe_sad:378719408345841664>

Remember, generalized statements like that based upon logic usually aren't attacks at you in particular.

it's nice how he thinks that atheists and agnostics are more likely to be immoral, despite studies that show evidence to the contrary. I wonder if he justifies this by going the Peterson route by claiming those people aren't really atheists <:pepe_smug:378719408341909506>

Agnostic folks generally aren't considered atheist. There is a reason these are two different terms.

And to be fair, and not to sound rude: there are far more pressing things to worry about and people to bitch about than someone that agrees with you on the majority of things wrong in society today, but has a bit of a religious tint to his activism.

Who said anything about them being the same, though?

Well considering what you said, about a study regarding athiests AND agnostics, and then about Peterson saying something about people not being atheist, that's the only thing I could think of to bring up that would follow the logic I see outright.

I do not recall off the top of my hat if people who said they believed in some kind of spirit or life force of the universe, were lumped in with atheists, in the studies that showed differences in moral behavior between them and religious people

Agnostics basically are indecisive, atheists are confident.

that's not the distinction I generally see

I think it'd be easier to seperate into groups those who believe in objective morality/ethics, and those who don't.

it's usually agnostic atheism vs gnostic atheism

and the people who say they believe in some kind of life force or spirit, are really just some kind of new age spiritualist

I also don't consider the majority of self-proclaimed Christians to be Christian. 70% of America identifies as Christian, and I can guarantee there aren't nearly enough Churches for that many actual Christians.

so you decide who is christian and who isn't? I generally tend to take people's word for it, if they say they're christian

is a christian someone who goes to church every week?