Yes, to your first, no to your second.

I dont think you can hold the first one and not the second one while remaining consistent

Why not? I find people arguing someone else's' opinion disingenuous. I want a real opponent that will suffer actual consequences in their psyche when they lose.

Its irrelevant because if your goal is to come to the most correct opinion possible, whether the person you're arguing with actually believes what they're saying is irrelevant

To you

to you to

https://gyazo.com/dbc07302a43760af12ee7d3b2486eb30

No? I just told you it makes ALL the difference to me if the person legitimately holds their opinion.

Why though

You're just making an ad hominem fallacy

I told you. The stakes are higher. *It's worth it.*

I dont know what that means

I want them to rage quit when they discover they're wrong.

Gotta have heart behind it.

If your goal is to come to the most correct opinion possible, then thats irrelevant

Well, then, no.

My goal with debating is to win.

If I want to be right, i'll discuss.

What is the difference between a discussion and a debate to you

Y'know, I'm having a hard time making that distinction right now. I guess it depends on what both parties want out of it.

Would you say that in a discussion the primary goal is to come to the most correct opinion while a debate the primary goal is to be right

For me, debates usually happen when I call someone out for something they said which is stupidly wrong

Yes

But in regards to the content of a discussion compared to a debate, what differentiates the two

Whether it bothers you or not, maybe?

Like, this is a discussion, because I honestly don't care about this topic.

I dont think we're gonna agree on this and I have to go, was fun talking

stay safe my dude

Any fellow Anarcho-Fascists here?

<:think_hang:378717098903470080>

https://www.quora.com/Why-do-so-many-people-think-that-socialism-is-when-the-government-does-things-and-not-when-the-means-of-production-or-controlled-by-the-working-class/answer/Saulius-Muliolis
@Fitzydog

the author isn't a <:thronk:441701565607444482> er, but the people he writes about is

Damn

TIL the military and roads (concepts that existed centuries before Marx was conceived) are socialist

thanks berniebros

Thanks for educating me

/s

Other than the military, either everything listed is local government entirely, or is something that really is socialist

You guys debated about not having a debate

For a solid hour no less

<:pepe_smug:378719408341909506>

https://wccftech.com/two-minute-hack-shows-how-easy-it-is-to-gain-admin-access-on-an-elections-voting-machine/