I.... don't know what you're saying but okay

There's literally *one* barrier at this new level, and that is Visa/MasterCard

meaning whoever gets outed as being the deplatformer will be no one of consequence

I guess you haven't heard how far he wants to go with it

how far ?

Like, replacing stripe/Paypal

All DIY in house

But guess who is friends with the Intellectual Dark web? <:pepe_smug:378719408341909506>

who

Peter Thiel, the original creator of PayPal

will probably be crypto friendly then

well, whatever it ends up being, if it's tied in any way to the traditional banks and payment processors then it won't work

Thing is, the higher up you go, the more regulation you have. Eventually you reach a point where the company has no choice but to service you

one problem I could see then would be the site getting gabbed

it would have to be soup-to-nuts DIY from the ground up like 1998 style shit

Or exist entirely on the blockchain/hyperchain

right, maybe a use-case for storj or something

Or there's the 'new' internet

I still don't know how it's used

I should probably read more about that

I heard of it, but I'm with you - no idea how it's used

I think all user data is linked to the user account, which is singular/universal across all sites, and your account is 'hosted' by a server which serves your data on request of a particular site

So basically, cloud based meme folders, where you hotlink your stuff instead of uploading it

not sure how i feel about the singular/universal part

It's not like a replacement

Imagine like the split between image boards and social media

But platforms can't really get rid of you anymore

Just 'ban' you, but they have no inherent advantage of owning a database to control, so there's more competition of platforms

oh that would definitely be a no-no for the elites

I think Sargon's experience with Patreon might be an indicator that they only let you live as long as you aren't big enough to be a threat - once you cross that line you're done

Not sure how i feel about the 'at request of the site' part moreso

I'm writing what I think it is they're trying to do. Take it with a grain of salt.

I'm fairly confident you can select what info is given to them. Kind of like sharing a google doc or whatever? Does that makes sense?

Like, you would 'delete' a social media account by taking away the hotlinking rights to the site via your end

By 'request' I meant like "Oh, someone wants to know who Fitz is. Better pull up his bio...", and then 'request' it from the server your account is hosted on

George Galloway just said that Trident is useless against Drones flying over Gatwick

Fucking anti-nuclear mental twat

"What incentive would these online credit brokers have to make this 'ultimatum' to Patreon?"
https://www.forbes.com/sites/norbertmichel/2018/11/05/newly-unsealed-documents-show-top-fdic-officials-running-operation-choke-point/#1a6fce611911

this is the bill that is supposed to reverse the main problem of Operation Choke Point: https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/2706/text

```SEC. 2. REQUIREMENTS FOR DEPOSIT ACCOUNT TERMINATION REQUESTS AND ORDERS.

(a) Termination Requests Or Orders Must Be Valid.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—An appropriate Federal banking agency may not formally or informally request or order a depository institution to terminate a specific customer account or group of customer accounts or to otherwise restrict or discourage a depository institution from entering into or maintaining a banking relationship with a specific customer or group of customers unless—

(A) the agency has a valid reason for such request or order; and

>>>(B) such reason is not based solely on reputation risk.<<<```

remember she used to work for PayPal during the Obama administration and looks like she's still operating under these conditions

Sargon's brand is deemed a reputational risk to them
she basically keeps repeating that point