We all answer to one Constitution.

Actually, add Greenland to the image above

If there WERE going to be a single world government, I think the US would do best with its constitution.

It is a very good basis that almost everyone would mostly agree upon.

the way it is now, it's not exactly set up for the little guy to have a voice at the head of the country

That will be true for any world government

which is deliberate

State governments are designed to be more immediately answerable

and more tailored for the local population

i get that, but the national government has power over everything, and that can be dangerous

imagine Hillary had gotten in.

No

just for a minute

The GOP Senate and House would gridlock the fuck out of her

by design

There is a clear distinction between authorities

Well, semi-fuzzy

The US approach on that front is for the most gridlock-prone, slow-moving government feasibly possible

Far superior to the Canadian/British monarchist system

take out the monarch part and our system is pretty good at being representative

especially the UK's, where there are no de jure checks against the monarch's power

```In the case of the government being unable to approve a new budget, they should use whatever funds remain from the last budget
```

thoughts?

Removing the monarch part from the Canadian system leaves no supreme executive authority

Mmmmmmmmm yeah..... The Queen can legally take back authority.

The Queen legally has ALL authority in the UK

She is the head of state technically

consensus is the supreme authority

No, the constitution is in Canada

and the constitution only says that the Queen can give Canada its own government if she wants

right now, the Liberals have a majority and they are all puppets, so Justine can get away with anything

or maybe it was the Constitution Act of Canada, I forget which

but the Queen is the supreme executive authority in Canada

if they had a backbone, his own constituents could tell him he's crazy and move against it

essentially, but not really

the consensus is technically

One of the big advantages of the US system is that national party platforms are rarely, if ever, adhered to because every representative is more concerned with their local constituency

Either way, you guys are going to have to pick sides at some point, because it is very clear that zcanada doesn't know how the fuck to avoid being oppressive and tyranical.

we have local reps at a federal level that aren't that far detached from the riding they serve

hence the current arrangement where the vast majority of the country likes their specific representative, but Congress has a really low approval rating because nobody likes anyone ELSE'S representatives