Just a question I’d like to see some takes on. Is there something wrong with doing experiments on people who have done Very heinous acts, and are already on the death-row or life sentence?

Well duh

Ask Hitler

ask the Soviets

@MountainMan d class personnel

Yes. D-class personnel. <:pepe_smug:378719408341909506>

Do you need to know that they were horrible people to experiment on them, to ease your conscience?

I say, offer compensation and make it legal for everyone

More like people that are already gonna get executed.

Like blood donors

Actually, don't give a compensation

Like blood donors

The latter idea seems pretty good. Just no compensation tho.

Just admit it Mountain Man you just wanna experiment on people and you're looking for an excuse

^

Death sentence in the west isn't even that common anymore

<:pepe_smug:378719408341909506>

what countries even still have it?

You would have to get them from China and other shitholes

some states in the US I believe, and mostly third world countries.

No

I dont know any european nations which do capital punishments.

Respect people’s rights, no matter how abhorrent they are

And it's mostly political dissidents or actual journalist in those countries

@AlephKnoll

A legend

Ok thx

Its interesting that russia has a practical abolition on execution

but belarus doesn't

@Kalandros May I ask why? Sure, I do agree. But I would love to hear an explanation of why.

@MountainMan it's *universal* rights

Because you wouldn’t want it to happen to you either. We need to remember that under layers of badness, there is still a human convinced they’re doing the right thing

So people who have commited crimes against humanity, they shouldn't be executed?

No, I don’t think they should

I see.

It's not revenge or cruelty, it's a balance of reforming and keeping society safe

They should stand trial and be imprisoned for life, or at least dealt with accordingly

Yeah I agree^

If anything because you can't ever be sure that there wasn't a mistake