@Deleted User but tzhats also a big part of why they dont wwant as much muslims

ehh

imo it's more about them not feeling any kind of guilt

cuz poland didn't really have a colonialist past

afaik

im atheist but I feel there needs to be a bigger counterweight to islam, and atheism aint it

eh, no

replacing one ideology with another won't solve anything

Libertarianism is the solution @Holy Intersectional Inquisition

@Deleted Userhi

how is it?

libertarianism seems far too wishy washy to me

korwin dindu nuffin wrong

replace islam with any ideology I dont care

not as wishy washy as social democrats

why replace when you can just eliminate

That isn't a libertarian value, elimination never solves anything

Counter-dialogue does

elimination through counter dialogue

i don't mean bomb every muslim on earth

and why do we need to replace islam anyway?

just get rid of it altogether

along with christianity and all that dumb shit

Also how is libertarianism wishy-washy? Its grounded in centuries of philosophy starting with John Locke before diversification by Rothbard, Friedman, Hayek and Rand?

cuz libertarianism is "freedom this" "freedom that"

Well yes because freedom is the goal

if we're gonna solve problems we need to attack head on

And many actions taken by the state aren't pro-freedom

We must remain principled, not take things issue-by-issue

a rigid set of morals is libertarian?

sounds more conservative to me

issue by issue would be the libertarian approach

there's a difference between principles and morals

Libertarianism HAS a rigid set of principles, yes. And no, conservatism isn't as pro-freedom as you'd think - many conservatives are very protectionist

Like Trump

conservatism is always relative

Yes the definition is very flexible

what might be consider conservative in on country might be consider liberal in another

A conservative in the US is pro-gun, a conservative in the UK is not

For example

Because the overton window on gun-rights is shifted all the way to the left in the UK