Message from @🌻 togepi 🌻
Discord ID: 507417128442527744
I'm off to bed
yes but your theoretical deduction skills arent the sharpest rn
dab 2.0
If you make an absolute statement all you have to do to disprove it is find one thing that contradicts the absolute
Its really fun too
Like when someone says there is an absolute morality all you have to do is find one contradiction
like?
> I have an objective morality
> Sometimes I make exceptions that are a better choice in the situation
lol
going against objective morality does not disprove its objectiveness
But you made a moral choice that you believed was right that went against it
This isn't difficult. If you make the claim that we live in a moral universe, a universe with an objective moral standard, that exists independently of what anybody thinks, simply describe what that standard is and how we know what it is. You've said that moral questions have a true or false quality to them, so say how we discover that truth or falsehood. If you actually have a point that isn't complete and utter shit, you can answer that most basic of basic questions.
Funnily enough, Occam's razor has an application here.
> Cant wait to see the whole text of the bible dropped in here
> I propose the whole text of the bee movie as my alternative objective morality
the objective morality by definition would be indescribable by a human as we could not understand it
Option 1).
Morality is objective, but you can go against it with subjective descisions.
Option 2).
Morality is subjective.
> using arrows
> putting spaces before the text
> .
> quoting my actions and other's actions with verb phrases
calling all academics lmao 📞
That doesn't answer the question.
was posting a quote
h/o
academics plz respond
Yeah Paul, explain the morality of the universe right now please
So what makes christian morality the true objective morality as opposed to say...
satanic morality?
No is doesn't Dan. Because murder would go against the natural imperative of the human species, ensuring the species survival.
Whereas in other species the weaklings are killed because their survival will be a detriment to the survival of a species.
how dare you posit a theory that there's an objective morality without being ready to define the code of the universe
The fundamental Christian ethics
@DanConway I'm responding to the quote you deleted.
Kinda hard to give a full fledged response though since you deleted it.
@HungBunny don't make a claim if you can't back it up. He claims there's an objective morality, but won't say what it is or where it comes from or how he knows its there. It's nothing but an empty assertion and he's done nothing but dodge answering to any of it for over an hour. Bloody unbelievable.
the point of the quote was that arguing about which one is better implies there is a correct answer outside of personal preference in order for it to be a meaningful conversation
Being outside of personal preference does not make it objective. Hence the example I provided above.
Arguing which one is better means there's an argument. Which means there are people who believe in each side.
The sky is blue nigga