what do you not understand about the argument

if it is true

it is objectively best

"stone the gays"

and?

AND?

@Roarey Ok, and why?

what is your point

"Do not kill". -The god damn commandments.

Murder

christianity is not objective morality as it was created, something that its defined cannot be an all encompassing objective truth

unjust killing

Both are used

christianity is true -> stone the gays && the best == contradiction

@HungBunny what do you want, an essay? I can't be fucked. Make a point if you have one.

depending which bible you're reading

do you understand why we do not "stone the gays"

Dan believes in the Latin bible because he doesn't want to freely believe in something

Because youve subjectively realized that its a stupid thing to do

no

Because secular values have told religious zealots that if they do stone gay people they'll go to prison.

also no

the bible is full of God fucking with people right after he told them not to do whatever he gets them to do next

When was the last time a Christian stoned a gay person

In the west

That's not the point

the point is the contradiction.

When people realized stoning was barbaric and came to their subjective senses

^

Why don't they do it if the bible is their objective moral code? Because it isn't their objective moral code so they've decided murdering gay people with fucking rocks is revolting.

You understand what Ceremonial law and moral law in the bible is?

You don't understand shit.

You're a liar and a slippery weasel.

If you went to catholic school for 13 years you should

So fuck off.

Why are you so triggered

You asked me to list five things I'm morally against. What was the first one.

It's the idea that the church has a monopoly on the definition of marriage is, and that marriage is for the purpose of producing good little catholic babies that grow up to have successful lives and donate 10% of their income to the church

no

And you're acting like a bit of a cunts because of it

stoneing the gays