though her dialogue may have been historically accurate, who knows

i guess the reasonable heads came forward eventually, amid all the crazy terrorism and othering

Whatup with that caravan, where they at

was there any MLK-like sufragettes

who knows, anyway im lazy

its likely that the far left looks at the terrorism of 100 years ago that nobody in media or school or anywhere talks about, and feels inspired

Didn't the suffragettes set fire to a building where a meeting was held between representatives of the city and other women WHILE everybody was IN THE BUILDING ???

citation?

that sounds fucked tho

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suffragette

I don't know where I heard it, I think Rags talked about it in a video on his channel

the fucking furry talked about it, ok

jk

https://listverse.com/2017/04/20/top-10-reasons-the-suffragettes-were-actually-terrorists/

seems like the progressive left has always had a problem with domestic terrorism lol

I love the example with the men's only café. They complained that women were not allowed and the owner replied with "Well they can come in if they work here" ... the suffragettes burned it down

doesn't matter that they threw all those women that worked there into unemployment and poverty

<:think_woke:378717098681171988>

because feminists don't care about women they care about feminists

look at walk on girls/grid girls

we're fat ugly and undesirable so you can't have a job that depends on your looks

Oi

coming from the gender that claims there would be no wars if it controlled everything

Oh and what's also very nice and loely about the suffragettes is that they were really big into the white feathers movement ... you know ... socially blaming and bullying men into suicide because they had the audacity not wanting to go to a useless war and getting themselves killed

this is all stuff i'd never heard of, thanks

There were Suffragette protesters that were normal protesters, that really wanted to so good and did good, by using normal protest, perhabs things that were publicity stunts etc, but very normal stuff by todays standarts ... BUT ... there were also the types that we would call domestic terrorists today

doesn't "Oh what a lovely war" basically label the white feathers as sluts?

like they just go around sleeping with every man who's a soldier

kind of a hilarious gag actually

Yep, big issue. Once the war ended there was actually a semi saw back lash to it

if you see a white feather, you know she's got a loose pussy, just saying

grid girls <:GWcmeisterPeepoLove:403295311189245952>

How dare these sluts to sell their bodies to the patriarchy reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

"Of course, many of them were terrorists. So what? Terrorism is only wrong insofar as it is perpetrated in the name of an unjust or otherwise immoral cause. Fighting for equality, for getting their due rights as citizens of a democratic republic, is not merely a just cause but one that established the very country whose administration they were fighting against."

a comment by Rishabh Jain

hmmm, where have I heard a name like that

"The suffragettes were terrorists indeed, and the criterion here classifies every violent revolutionary as one. It all depends on the moral strength of your cause. Women's suffrage was one that justified a full-blown revolution, a civil war, even, not merely petty terrorist acts. I think the suffragettes must be commended on their restraint, if anything."

so if you have the moral strength, my brudda, and your morals are 'correct' my brudda, than there's NO BAD TACTICS

👌

what a great comment

so woke