Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 509395555336585226
which is tiny
an unnoticeable blip in time
except if it affects the people who depend on the river, it's not a blip to them
it's not creating a nuclear wasteland, it's changing the biome from woodland/jungle/whatever, to river/lake
we have a dam up here that's being protested
and I went down south and everyone is protesting it
and I'm like "what the fuck, where do you idiots think your power is coming from?"
Either way, *why the hell are we telling the third world how to industrialize their nations??*
Cuz we know how it's done
So?
So they can learn from us
Or would they rather still live in mud huts?
Sure, they can come here, get educated and then go back
Uh, no
hold it right there pal
We can just tell them what we did
because we got
And how we did it
Like intellectual foreign aid
<:GWfroggyPepoThumb:400751103223922689>
@Deleted User I think you're missing the context here.
Some of these international environmental treaties force the third world to act a certain way, or prevent them from using certain resources in a manner we consider "unclean"
Oh, well
My bad then
I just finished a lecture and I saw the last bit of the convo
you pretty much saw the whole thing, we just started
Yeah, the article was about how building dams in industrializing nations is "bad"
I was bitching about people not wanting hydroelectric dams
Well, I guess the West has some kind of interest in keeping third world countries as shitholes
Yes, let's prevent sub Sahara Africa from using coal, diesel, or hydro electric
Cuz if we industrialise them they will start using their own oil xD
and i just said it wasnt without consequences
And we won't be able to bring democracy there anymore
<:GWcmeisterPeepoShrug:403295315685539852>
in order to advance, we will need to permanently affect parts of the landscape by turning them into sustainable sources of electricity
instead of constantly relying on burning shit
They can do that themselves tho
If we teach them

