Message from @Elijah
Discord ID: 534544332129173547
Harvest Mars for resources
Renewables right now aren't reliable for a primary energy source. Too reliant on weather.
@Elijah I'm being facetious to point out that's what solar panels are. We're reflecting solar radiation back into the atomosphere.
True
we should make our seaports and cities ready for changes in sealevel and improve on our knowledge of robotics for the inevitable die offs
@Harazu Keshtah No u
For solar or wind to be primary power sources we need breakthroughs in energy storage.
Nuclear Energy might also be a good option.
I'm shocked nobody ever thinks of this climate scientists are good at defining the peramiters but we should leve the problem solving to enginers
@Harazu Keshtah That's the biggest problem conservatives have with climate change.
You all think you have the authority to make demands of me.
The down side with that is uranium still needs transported.
atm I think nuclear is the best option
I'm a major proponent of Nuclear Energy
I acctualy don't disagree
same
Right now the best balance of clean and realiable is nuclear plants, yes.
We have enough Uranium in the oceans to keep us going for hundreds of thousands of years.
We just need a good way to extract it.
We should probably try to move to Nuclear first.
*"We"*
Don't get me wrong.
I don't think we should be compelled to.
That doesn't mean I don't think we should.
the tests they did with thorium was promising as well as it give little to no bad left overs and is almost impossible to get a runaway reaction with, but as it was nuclear is was deemed bad and killed off
Plus
People are going to force us to do stuff anyways.
Orbital solar beamed to the ground might be the way to go if we get a proper orbital infrastructure set up.
It might as well be stuff we agree with.
That's why I don't buy any of this climate shit.
Because it's too perfect of a ploy for governments to make demands of its populace, in the name of an emergency.
I still say the best solution is building our infrastructure to survive a crisis rather than futily terraform the planet we got into this mess because past humans couldn't forsee the consequences how do the climate scientists know for sure that their proposals won't cause problems too aside from the obvious need for a despotic state to even enact their stupid terraforming projects
@Fitzydog Which is why we need to talk about it, and make sure we understand risks vs rewards.
Rather than simply listening to the pundits.
Which is why we need to fund opposing viewpoints
@Fitzydog I don't think it's invente but absolutly the global tyrants of the world are taking advantage to push more tyrany
Well, as I said, even with no climate change, current power generation produces pollution anyway.
Tyrants will use everything they can to increase their tyranny.
@Harazu Keshtah You've seen where NASA is doctoring data in real time, right?
Like, they're editing 15-20 year old data, and retroactively adjusting temperatures
It's already published, but their web stuff is different