We should probably try to move to Nuclear first.

Then use Nuclear energy to produce Solar Panels

*"We"*

Don't get me wrong.

I don't think we should be compelled to.

That doesn't mean I don't think we should.

the tests they did with thorium was promising as well as it give little to no bad left overs and is almost impossible to get a runaway reaction with, but as it was nuclear is was deemed bad and killed off

Plus

People are going to force us to do stuff anyways.

Orbital solar beamed to the ground might be the way to go if we get a proper orbital infrastructure set up.

It might as well be stuff we agree with.

That's why I don't buy any of this climate shit.

Because it's too perfect of a ploy for governments to make demands of its populace, in the name of an emergency.

I still say the best solution is building our infrastructure to survive a crisis rather than futily terraform the planet we got into this mess because past humans couldn't forsee the consequences how do the climate scientists know for sure that their proposals won't cause problems too aside from the obvious need for a despotic state to even enact their stupid terraforming projects

@Fitzydog Which is why we need to talk about it, and make sure we understand risks vs rewards.

Rather than simply listening to the pundits.

Which is why we need to fund opposing viewpoints

@Fitzydog I don't think it's invente but absolutly the global tyrants of the world are taking advantage to push more tyrany

Well, as I said, even with no climate change, current power generation produces pollution anyway.

Tyrants will use everything they can to increase their tyranny.

@Harazu Keshtah You've seen where NASA is doctoring data in real time, right?

Like, they're editing 15-20 year old data, and retroactively adjusting temperatures

@Fitzydog Source?

It's already published, but their web stuff is different

my nigga I'm absolutely dyin rn

So it's still a good idea to move away from fossil fuels. Not to mention peak oil is an issue.

I'm writing shit up for my midterm exams on the rights guaranteed to students under the first amendment taking Tinker v. Des Moines into account

it fucking sucks peepee

@Elijah https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2012/06/13/doctored-data-not-u-s-temperatures-set-a-record-this-year/#3db33aab6184

@Werlf What is your thesis?

goverments lie the principles are sound though I still don't know why nobody wants to talk about yellowstone exploding

more C02 than we could ever put into the air all at once

Students shouldn't have to relinquish their 1a rights on school grounds, however it needs to be in reason, not being incredibly disruptive or violent, etc. And these protections only extend to not including said disruption or calls to violence

@Elijah You can literally look up the original studies in archives, and compare them to the 'cited' numbers in todays work, and they're different

if we disaster proof our civ (vaugury I know but I haven't thought deeply about this) than yellowstone exploding is just an inconvinence heck it even solves the meteor hitting the earth problem and colonizing the solar system thing

so It's a decently in depth essay

I've got to use around 13 documents to back up my reasoning so I've got my work cut out for me

@Fitzydog Dang

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yqZGgaZaXig&t=1188s

"Students shouldn't have to relinquish their 1a rights on school grounds, however it needs to be in reason, not being incredibly disruptive or violent, etc. And these protections only extend to not including said disruption or calls to violence"

Public or Private University?

public school

High School