Message from @Harazu Keshtah

Discord ID: 534544093850763265


2019-01-15 01:24:30 UTC  

Let's put a whole bunch of reflective panels over the surface of the earth

2019-01-15 01:24:30 UTC  

If Co2 levels rise to an ungodly amount we kill people.

2019-01-15 01:24:36 UTC  

No

2019-01-15 01:24:49 UTC  

and yellowstone exploding causes that instantly

2019-01-15 01:24:55 UTC  

Right Wing, we should make a sphere of panels around the Sun.

2019-01-15 01:24:58 UTC  

Dyson Sphere

2019-01-15 01:25:16 UTC  

Harvest Mars for resources

2019-01-15 01:25:26 UTC  

Renewables right now aren't reliable for a primary energy source. Too reliant on weather.

2019-01-15 01:25:30 UTC  

@Elijah I'm being facetious to point out that's what solar panels are. We're reflecting solar radiation back into the atomosphere.

2019-01-15 01:25:46 UTC  

True

2019-01-15 01:25:47 UTC  

we should make our seaports and cities ready for changes in sealevel and improve on our knowledge of robotics for the inevitable die offs

2019-01-15 01:25:59 UTC  
2019-01-15 01:26:26 UTC  

For solar or wind to be primary power sources we need breakthroughs in energy storage.

2019-01-15 01:26:42 UTC  

Nuclear Energy might also be a good option.

2019-01-15 01:26:48 UTC  

I'm shocked nobody ever thinks of this climate scientists are good at defining the peramiters but we should leve the problem solving to enginers

2019-01-15 01:26:50 UTC  

@Harazu Keshtah That's the biggest problem conservatives have with climate change.

You all think you have the authority to make demands of me.

2019-01-15 01:26:51 UTC  

The down side with that is uranium still needs transported.

2019-01-15 01:26:57 UTC  

atm I think nuclear is the best option

2019-01-15 01:27:13 UTC  

I'm a major proponent of Nuclear Energy

2019-01-15 01:27:19 UTC  

I acctualy don't disagree

2019-01-15 01:27:23 UTC  

same

2019-01-15 01:27:26 UTC  

Right now the best balance of clean and realiable is nuclear plants, yes.

2019-01-15 01:27:26 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/372507611284766722/534544108338020354/image0.jpg

2019-01-15 01:27:29 UTC  

We have enough Uranium in the oceans to keep us going for hundreds of thousands of years.

2019-01-15 01:27:42 UTC  

We just need a good way to extract it.

2019-01-15 01:28:12 UTC  

We should probably try to move to Nuclear first.

2019-01-15 01:28:20 UTC  

Then use Nuclear energy to produce Solar Panels

2019-01-15 01:28:22 UTC  

*"We"*

2019-01-15 01:28:35 UTC  

Don't get me wrong.

2019-01-15 01:28:43 UTC  

I don't think we should be compelled to.

2019-01-15 01:28:48 UTC  

That doesn't mean I don't think we should.

2019-01-15 01:28:56 UTC  

the tests they did with thorium was promising as well as it give little to no bad left overs and is almost impossible to get a runaway reaction with, but as it was nuclear is was deemed bad and killed off

2019-01-15 01:29:04 UTC  

Plus

2019-01-15 01:29:13 UTC  

People are going to force us to do stuff anyways.

2019-01-15 01:29:15 UTC  

Orbital solar beamed to the ground might be the way to go if we get a proper orbital infrastructure set up.

2019-01-15 01:29:19 UTC  

It might as well be stuff we agree with.

2019-01-15 01:29:23 UTC  

That's why I don't buy any of this climate shit.

Because it's too perfect of a ploy for governments to make demands of its populace, in the name of an emergency.

2019-01-15 01:29:25 UTC  

I still say the best solution is building our infrastructure to survive a crisis rather than futily terraform the planet we got into this mess because past humans couldn't forsee the consequences how do the climate scientists know for sure that their proposals won't cause problems too aside from the obvious need for a despotic state to even enact their stupid terraforming projects

2019-01-15 01:29:56 UTC  

@Fitzydog Which is why we need to talk about it, and make sure we understand risks vs rewards.

2019-01-15 01:30:06 UTC  

Rather than simply listening to the pundits.

2019-01-15 01:30:14 UTC  

Which is why we need to fund opposing viewpoints