Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 645035288707465218
r1b isn't neolithic..
Chad I1 proto-Europeans
lo
it's not about clustering
all genes don't matter equally
banjod come out with the big brained take plz
shut these autists up
"france" is a mixed group
some cluster closer to north westerners, other closer to meds..
all groups are mixed... you mean more mixed I guess
I mean mixed between larger sub groups
for me, there are 3 major groups, north western, slavs and meds
when you look at norway and english you have to consider that I, for example, don't consider the northern nrowegians the same
slavs have mongol trace admixture, and meds have north africa trace admixture
so it worries me when these groups invade the west and bring their foreign genes with them
I don't know what yo mean by trace dna
that doesn't mean all of them do, but if we have a policy where they do dna test, and culturally align with more western ideas, than I would be ok
greeks have 0% sub saharan dna
@charles that was sort of the american policy at that point you would be accepting the vast majority of poles
how about we dont do brain drain?
SSA admixture is found in SW europe mostly
some poles are closer to english than some french are and visa versa
but brits ARE french
I'm not claiming to be an expert on any of this stuff, these are just arguments I've heard that make sense to me
finns have high amount of asian dna
to such an extent, they are no longer white imop
to me it sounds like coping because they dont like poles, but whatever
some poles are, some poles aren't
i am against importing poles into the west in general
but poles overall aren't north western
are u trying to figure out white identity?
I don't dislike any groups, but I think it makes sense to keep the groups seperate so they can maintain their unique identities
Poles are white, that doesnt mean much, we shouldnt braindrain poles
this is completely dependant on what you care about