https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=e6jyySJQJR8

r1b isn't neolithic..

Chad I1 proto-Europeans

lo

it's not about clustering

all genes don't matter equally

banjod come out with the big brained take plz

shut these autists up

"france" is a mixed group

some cluster closer to north westerners, other closer to meds..

all groups are mixed... you mean more mixed I guess

I mean mixed between larger sub groups

for me, there are 3 major groups, north western, slavs and meds

when you look at norway and english you have to consider that I, for example, don't consider the northern nrowegians the same

slavs have mongol trace admixture, and meds have north africa trace admixture

so it worries me when these groups invade the west and bring their foreign genes with them

<:steflol:561214382181318656>

I don't know what yo mean by trace dna

that doesn't mean all of them do, but if we have a policy where they do dna test, and culturally align with more western ideas, than I would be ok

greeks have 0% sub saharan dna

@charles that was sort of the american policy at that point you would be accepting the vast majority of poles

how about we dont do brain drain?

SSA admixture is found in SW europe mostly

some poles are closer to english than some french are and visa versa

but brits ARE french

I'm not claiming to be an expert on any of this stuff, these are just arguments I've heard that make sense to me

finns have high amount of asian dna

to such an extent, they are no longer white imop

to me it sounds like coping because they dont like poles, but whatever

some poles are, some poles aren't

i am against importing poles into the west in general