i may be biased but i dont think foreskin is too much better than having none.

Lmao

Being circumcised = less nerves on your penis thus less pleasure

Simple as is

mmm the nerve tissue of the foreskin is usually not responsible for sexual pleasure, afaik

a properly done circumcision should not reduce sexual pleasure, but in fact, enhance it

but maybe for some it's different

after all no penis is alike

suppose it depends on how much foreskin you have also

Enhance? Do tell

yeah the idea being to increase friction of contact with the most sensitive parts of the penis during intercourse

you know the foreskin rolls back right?

im no penis doctor though, so i cant be sure on the science there.

yep sure

there's only one way to find out

dicks out guys

it is time

we must cut off a 20-something year old's foreskin

wtf

he must be a college attendee and having intercourse roughly every week.

I thought we were just gonna have sex, see who cums first, that kind of thing

then we shall know

we will do that after

ok

BRUH

you had me worried for a second

bring forth the foreskin bearer

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11761.x

wot dis

purported loss of sensitivity in circumcised males

oof

so the study is already done

well this is less stimulating than expected

much like my circumcised penis

lol

unfortunate

<:why:638779720015675405>

JF has made some statements about circumcision that are pretty interesting

anyway i feel plenty satisfied during sex

it's uncertain what impact it has on reproduction

maybe it's about endurance lol