Message from @Str3tch
Discord ID: 654065161010675715
they don't get porn?
Not feasible. Porn effects them just by existing
wat
close your eyes
lol
The sweet sweet smell of victory. And prolapsed porn actress anus.
you're saying the people should decide what to allow based on what they think is beneficial
so if people decide they think porn is beneficial
they still can't have it
because reasons?
need to get the public to understand the weaponization of pornagraphy first. just like it'd be good to get the public to observe the incredible jewish make-up of the shoddy impeachment effort
it depends. How many "people" have to think it is beneficial?
10%? 20%? 50%? 51%?
so, direct democracy?
Asking you
what is your criteria for society allowing it?
personally I'm ok with dumb people getting repercussions for their actions so I'm not in favor of a nanny state
See, that is not the people deciding
If a government decides that it wants to ban porn with an iron fist that's not "people".
Roskomandzor is the Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information Technology and Mass Media in Russia
and that is them telling pornhub that their demography is not a commodity to be exploited
Thts just it, you cant just let dumb people do dumb shit and it NOT affect society
The random house shooting is an exaple
sure they might "face the reprecussions" but your family is dead. so who cares?
the random house shooting is already banned/illegal
Those goddamn authoritarians telling me i cant practice shooting at random houses
fucking Nazis
that has nothing to do with my arguments or your arguments
BASED
Sure it does. The whole point from the start isn't the benefits or detriments of pr0ns. I honestly dont care which way that ends up. my point is WHY do we pick and choose what the government decides what is detrimental to society.
you're telling me that on one hand, people should decide what is allowed based on what they think is a benefit, yet on the other hand even if they think its a benefit it still shouldn't be allowed
You still refuse to define "people"
well, you used the term first
you seem unhappy with individuals deciding for themselves
Are you talking about small groups of individuals or society as a large chunk?
Only insofar as that decisions can affect other people.
No decision is truly individual. We are just led to THINK that
so we can avoid blame for our actions
ok, if 51% of the population decided to buy gold tomorrow, the price of gold would go up, having an effect on the other 49% so that's not allowed?/
Ah! In many countries, what you just said, IS BANNED