yes, I see what you mean

As though Morality never existed before 1AD

@DarthSammich Ugh, "So how do you get morality if not for my little god-manual? Check mate atheists!"

yeah, that... he isn't the only one that uses that argument either.

for all of you

Wait... I thought Nick said that didn't happen?

>trying to claim NS as a Christian

<:steflol:561214382181318656>

@rEd Ghost(no hard R) Nick-tier arguments

<:kekboi:417880491182653450>

Either those 6 mil 🍪 got baked.... or they didn't

>inb4 muh Table Talks

here we go the fake NS that buy the jew narrative

Table Talks are great

you don't even need to look at Table Talks, Hitler endorses Nietzsche's attitude towards christianity in MK

And accurate

Heres an atheist telling you with actual quotes and footnotes why Hitler was a Christian

http://nobeliefs.com/Hitler1.htm

Positive Christianity was an attempt to make christianity into something where its own abolition would be more palatable

ofc he gives lip service

How many of you here have actual blood relatives that were in the Wehrmacht or SS

I have both

he was a political figure in a christian country

Wow cool
I've been btfo'd

@rEd Ghost(no hard R) Find some arguments that are actually worth a shit rather than "my daddy was waffen ss and you're all jews"

@rEd Ghost(no hard R) based

Table Talks is full of false quotes added with multiple translations for starters

Jesus fucking christ

Partially

Yes

But still

@The Eternal Swede Find an argument other than you dont like the truth you filthy pussy

<:virgin:396572545610022914>

Adolf Hitler, from TT:

based and longevity-pilled

Even if you believed the table-talk included the anti-Christian quotes, nowhere in the talk does Hitler speak against Jesus or his own brand of Christianity. On the contrary, the table-talk has Hitler speaking admirably about Jesus. Hitler did, of course criticize organized religion in a political sense (as do many Christians today), but never in a religious sense. But the problems with using Hitler's table talk conversations as evidence for Hitler's apostasy are manyfold:

1) The reliability of the source (hearsay and editing by the anti-Catholic, Bormann)

2) The reliability of multiple translations, from German to French to English.

3) The bias of the translators (especially Genoud).

4) The table-talk reflects thoughts that do not occur in Hitler's other private or public conversations.

5) Nowhere does Hitler denounce Jesus or his own brand of Christianity.

6) The "anti-Christian" portions of Table-Talk does not concur with Hitler's actions for "positive" Christianity.

Clearly the dog-ratio is violated

Mankind needs to do better

@rEd Ghost(no hard R) Yes