Message from @Prawn
Discord ID: 643790306306818048
No, you misunderstand his point. The comparison to twitter was to demonstrate that TPUSA choosing not have a QnA at a ticketed private event isnt a violation of free speech
whereas if the dialogue was to occur on something like twitter which is effectively the modern day town square, and opted to try and suppress questions
it would be a violation of free speech
who thought there would be a day where I'd defend tim pool
Twitter de-platforming people is also not a violation, if you go by private vs govt.
<:peepoW:569895299070296082>
sure but thats the conversation being had right now
is twitter the town square
tim thinks it is
Regardless if it was a private event, they did not do Q/A because of obvious reasons. I'd count that as a violation of Free Speech
so do a lot of conservatives
it was a private event, what obligation do they have to take questions?
choosing not to take questions
is not the same as suppressing speech
Not all private events, sure. But the ones advertising itself as "prove me wrong" (Dan Crenshaw's) and "change my mind" etc. should fall under this
and they both took questions
and were made to look like fools
I don't understand your point
The Trump JNR event was a book signing
don't get me wrong it was a major victory for fuentes
we are under to much scrutiny as it is
My point is that there was a Q/A event which was scheduled before hand, which was cancelled once they got the wind of the kind of audience that had showed up
And they cited "time constraints" as an excuse
Had there been regular socialists etc. who had showed up, they would've gladly taken their questions
So in that sense, they were censoring the Groypers to avoid conflict
Sure, but its not a violation of free speech
They chose to take an L rather than have repeats of crenshaw or kirk
framing it is a freespeech violation is massive reach
Nick retweeted this
> The phony @Timcast lied about @NickJFuentes in his most recent video.
> Doesn't name him but calls him and his people "white nationalist" and "far right", says he's not a real Trump supporter them begs for money.
Nick vs Tim will be interesting to watch
Is it safe to say that Tim is a cryptoleftist in the clothe of a centrist?
Im not even sure if there is a faggier political line than his
He's just a grifter who follows the money and monkey balances to avoid unnecessary controversy
I thought he was based when I saw this pic
But he is just another grifter