Message from @Spamers Male

Discord ID: 643545715674578955


2019-11-11 15:42:59 UTC  

yes

2019-11-11 15:43:11 UTC  

designed to destroy unity

2019-11-11 15:43:21 UTC  

to imprint the idea everyone's an asshole

2019-11-11 15:45:35 UTC  

and people believe those experiments on one hand and on the other that 4/5 soldiers shot above the enemies heads on purpose

2019-11-11 20:06:08 UTC  

^ new research? I thought that was commonsense for the longest time

2019-11-11 20:07:19 UTC  

some people need an authority to tell them what is obvious to others

2019-11-11 20:08:02 UTC  

I suppose

2019-11-11 20:08:34 UTC  

It pains my heart that moral grandstanding is a thing

2019-11-11 20:09:10 UTC  

What's worse than stubbornness? Stubbornness + Stupidity

2019-11-11 20:09:42 UTC  

amen

2019-11-11 20:14:04 UTC  

I have a feeling that study leans left

2019-11-11 20:14:15 UTC  

but I don't actually see many

2019-11-11 20:15:32 UTC  

The article doesn't seem to have any big indicators that it's leftist driven

2019-11-11 20:16:54 UTC  

moral grandstanding dwells in all sorts of ideologies

2019-11-11 20:17:35 UTC  

Though I'd say that moral grandstanding is a trait that is fundamentally totalitarian

2019-11-11 20:18:13 UTC  

yea if a study was done I would put my money there

2019-11-11 20:18:53 UTC  

if it was 20-30 years ago

2019-11-11 20:18:59 UTC  

probably the opposite

2019-11-11 20:19:51 UTC  

Have you seen one of Jonathan Haidt's more famous lectures in that one university?

2019-11-11 20:21:05 UTC  

This is the one I'm primarily referring to

2019-11-11 20:21:36 UTC  

He goes into an apt amount of detail with regards to how humans consider values "sacred"

2019-11-11 20:24:59 UTC  

It's commonsense, to me at least, that the more one considers a moral/value sacred, the more one is willing to grandstand for it.

2019-11-11 20:41:54 UTC  

I'll check laterr

2019-11-11 20:42:03 UTC  

not much time

2019-11-11 20:42:06 UTC  

gotta work

2019-11-11 21:11:45 UTC  

^^^*Genetics, archaeology and the far right: an unholy Trinity*

2019-11-11 21:12:57 UTC  

*ABSTRACT
Recent advances in archeogenetics have revived an interest in grand narratives in which ethnic groups are once again thought to be agents of historical change. New scientific developments are generating a sense of optimism that difficult questions in palaeodemography may, at last, be solved. However, genetic research often uncritically makes use of essentialist models of past populations, reifying genetic populations as ethnic groups. This paper explores how such views of the past may play into notions of racial purity and fears of non-European migrants, stoked by adherents of far-right ideologies.*

2019-11-11 21:23:53 UTC  

>you neebros are science deniers!
>Science doesn't support my rainbow-unicorn view of humanity! Reeeeeeeee!

2019-11-11 21:25:06 UTC  

not me bruh

2019-11-11 21:25:13 UTC  

I love jews

2019-11-11 21:25:18 UTC  

so basically they're just figuring out how to bury and discourage this work before it gets out there

2019-11-11 21:25:51 UTC  

"reifying"

2019-11-11 21:25:57 UTC  

<:facepalm:463903200819544077>

2019-11-11 21:26:48 UTC  

the author is a professor of archaeology at Cambridge

2019-11-11 23:57:10 UTC  

archeologists seem to be yuge cucks and leftists

2019-11-11 23:57:35 UTC  

remember that guest jf one had, from portugal

2019-11-11 23:57:41 UTC  

once