And don't you want a tiny cellphone where you control nothing but do all your electronic stuff? Not one one of those big ole kludgy computers where you can fully control everything

non homeowners, including people that live in tiny boxes are also more dependent on outside help/services (corporations) - including gov't - for their needs

it increases dependency on the outside

Yeah, if you could live in that on your own land and be self sufficient its not bad

yeah, and im sure there are people that would opt for that

in fact, i know there is

but this is also in the same vein of getting 30 y/o college graduates to accept live in micro-apartments in the hip part of town

they know people who live in cramped spaces like these are less likely to have families, or large families

all of these things are taken into consideration

I even looked into the tiny house thing 10 years ago

I was shocked that the fucker cost as much as a real house

lol, yeh

Thats when i knew it was a scam

I see. I guess I wasn't considering all the outside influences.

that's why the memes you see are like "live in the box, eat the bugs"

Its like buying shit at the grocery store, the package is CALLED the same thing, but its smaller and costs the same amount

it's part of an over-arching agenda

there are people moving off grid, downsizing, building small cabins and all that jazz, trying to reduce costs, become sustainable, live off the land etc, and that's ok

like 'my self reliance' on youtube, but this guy is an empty nester

Live in a small box and get a vasectomy goy!

^^^^

live in a box, eat bugs, don't work out (because weight lifting leads to fascism), u can be healthy at every size, be gay or trans, but if u insist on being hetero - get married and get a vasectomy so your wife will buy u "happy vasectomy day" presents and u can share pics of it for Reddit gold.......

all of this messaging is connected and goes in one direction

We goin' down down baby
No whites in the Land Rover

Question: What does collectivism mean to you guys? To me it basically goes hand in hand with communism. I think western culture while at times having nationalist tendencies has always been relatively individualistic compared to communist regimes or asian countries. I don't think collectivism is required to have an ethno state.

I don't see collectivism as a particularly western or white trait.

i think white people engage in high degree of voluntary collectivism

they score high in conscientiousness, relatively speaking

and i believe them to have what is considered "high-time preference" as a group. again relatively.....

they show concern for what curt doolittle would term "the commons"

so stuff like this makes them collectivist in a way, without needing coercion or force, or enslavement.

it may be a unique and dynamic characteristic.

Idk, to me it seems like, if the collectivism is voluntary then its compatible with individualism.

yeah, sure.

I mean I guess a lot of it is a matter of degrees.

Like, some people might take individualism to the point where you don't take care of your family or something.

Or on the other hand one might take collectivism to the other extreme and say your kids don't belong to you they belong to the collective and should be raised by the state like in some communist countries.

The answer is to compartmentalize private and public domains.

Man has individual level control in most areas. In matters that effect others, strict rules.

https://youtu.be/e084mPEcnEQ

Yes it did, but not 'by a bunch of people' rather by Trump single handedly.