no, we're not, and its the same principle

and the same mechanism

@Fénius Farsaid for calling me cringe. fuck it im done

Why can't towns be privately owned?

you did a cring

maximizing freedom is good, but not over the survival, thriving and improvement of a people

the city is not the property of the city government

These towns are not privately owned

@Fénius Farsaid im drunk and i still need to work out

it's not like we all don't do crings

work out then

some more than others

They *could* be. @Leaf

they aren't

more important than discussing what is and is not cring on discord

You still haven't explained how the incredibly effective policies implemented by federal government institutions were ineffective

@Fénius Farsaid nothing is more important than that

@Nerthulas#712 Well, they could be, and function the same.

and now for some reason you're telling me towns could be private property, which is so irrelevant

you function through a cuck based axiom, free your mind

well, they aren't

and I was talking about what exists

you know

in the real world

demand power for the individual and don't serve the ideology

Are you talking to me or weeb kid? @vicmaxim

Can you explain what the lack of effectiveness in the examples I just listed were? @Weaboo Kempeitai

the question was: are dry towns and counties (proper) voluntary societies?

everyone damn it

the answer is no

I don't have an ideology anyway

that's all

@Nerthulas There are privately owned towns and communities, and mutual arrangements that are also permitted. They're voluntary.

This is not what is being described

It is.

This hypothetical is unimportant

There isn't zero reason why a town can't self-govern.

we were talking about dry towns and counties in the US and Canada

No, what is being described is government owned municipalities effectively prohibiting substances

only a town

not a city