it's all a red herring

they take your money anyway

whether they enforce drug laws or not

* * * politicians

once again, you pretend that someone supports American policy

criminals*

its particularly funny considering that you're talking to beady

I mean, I can respect that beady opposes current forms of prohibition, like the use of private prisons, and prison for dealers in general.

@Weaboo Kempeitai do not forget "fast and furious" under Eric Holder

gave military grade weapons to cartel member

But how can you support prohibition without supporting an aggressive foreign policy? @Nerthulas

What is being compared is actual prohibition policies to the U.S. funding of cartels

because those aren't the same thing

Or you are using the financial support of drug traffickers to prove prohibition is ineffective

It's not prohibition, the U.S. government is funding cartels not suppressing them

I mean, the governments they fund and support take the extreme measures you advocate. @Leaf

'how can you support X without supporting Y?'

because I don't

Chile executed dealers, they all migrated to Mexico.

So it was effective

It wasn't, they were still making product, and smuggled it across the border with ease.

Including to Chile

snuggled

🤗

<:steflol:561214382181318656>

snuggled is better tbh

Ima sleep

Rly

In my cocaine bed

Snuggly

<:mlady:389497741769703424>

Weaboo and lsolace be like:
I'm gonna go to bed...
ok I'm going to bed
for real this time I'm going to bed

The government of one country cannot prohibit anything in another country

It's like saying Japan effectively prohibited drug trafficking but drug trafficking still existed in China so it didn't work

@Nerthulas I wonder where Isolace went...

I think this question was utterly ridiculous tbh

Mexico is not Chile's jurisdiction, it worked within Chile's jurisdiction, or more succinctly, it worked

On that note pls no more tag I need sleep as well

ok gn

Go to bed libtard