Message from @Str3tch
Discord ID: 634942562377138176
criminals*
its particularly funny considering that you're talking to beady
I mean, I can respect that beady opposes current forms of prohibition, like the use of private prisons, and prison for dealers in general.
@Weaboo Kempeitai do not forget "fast and furious" under Eric Holder
gave military grade weapons to cartel member
But how can you support prohibition without supporting an aggressive foreign policy? @Nerthulas
What is being compared is actual prohibition policies to the U.S. funding of cartels
because those aren't the same thing
Or you are using the financial support of drug traffickers to prove prohibition is ineffective
It's not prohibition, the U.S. government is funding cartels not suppressing them
I mean, the governments they fund and support take the extreme measures you advocate. @Leaf
'how can you support X without supporting Y?'
because I don't
Chile executed dealers, they all migrated to Mexico.
So it was effective
It wasn't, they were still making product, and smuggled it across the border with ease.
Including to Chile
snuggled
🤗
<:steflol:561214382181318656>
Ima sleep
Rly
In my cocaine bed
Snuggly
<:mlady:389497741769703424>
Weaboo and lsolace be like:
I'm gonna go to bed...
ok I'm going to bed
for real this time I'm going to bed
The government of one country cannot prohibit anything in another country
It's like saying Japan effectively prohibited drug trafficking but drug trafficking still existed in China so it didn't work
@Nerthulas I wonder where Isolace went...
I think this question was utterly ridiculous tbh
Mexico is not Chile's jurisdiction, it worked within Chile's jurisdiction, or more succinctly, it worked
On that note pls no more tag I need sleep as well
ok gn
Go to bed libtard
its only 9:30 for me
That's a good time to go to bed
<:wojack:396042478530330624>
I'm only an hour ahead of you lol