Message from @You feel safe with an account
Discord ID: 637883670161784852
tsk tsk, @EJGalecio. are you cheating or poly
@Deleted User wait, and you even made several assumptions too that make the situation worse. There a several populations there. I was talking to a friend from Mexico. The Spaniards are about 99 IQ. They are having low birth rates. They make up the rich cities like Mexico. The natives and mixed are like 85 - 80 IQ. >_>
A 90iq nation of 400 million people means around 4 million people with an IQ of 120+
Even to keep a capital going easily
socialist heat-map?
Well, you would actually have to break the population into several demographics, each having its own bell curve.
racist
Ok, but I'm talking aggregate 90 lol
So it averages out
You are doing a total bell curve population. IF you average it out, your calculation is wrong.
maintenance in mexico probably isn't the same thing i'm thinking of
he's saying that's inaccurate because of the regional compositions
The SD is what is important. The different populations would have their own SD.
Let me make an example
Wdym? Weak law of large numbers
A bell curve is made up of infinite bell curves
I never
Central limit theorem as well
we only assume
```in some situations, when independent random variables are added, their properly normalized sum tends toward a normal distribution```
Oof to doubt the empiracy of either is a tall task
Bell curves are not a precise law of nature
The normal distribution is everywhere
empiracy of the distribution of genetic traits on mexico's jungle? i have little experience there
Say there is a population with a IQ average of 100. One population makes 33 million with an IQ average of 120. The other population makes up 67 million. It has an IQ average of 90. You are saying that population groups makes 15 million people with an IQ of 115 and higher. In reality, they have way more.
bell-curves is too christian-centrist...
call them menorah-curves instead.
They would have over 35 million with an IQ over 115.
Get what I am saying @Deleted User .
Ok, that would be true in theory yes
But that's not what we're facing
My statement was obviously with built in assumptions
I admit
``` Physical quantities that are expected to be the sum of many independent processes (such as measurement errors) often have distributions that are nearly normal.[3] ```
You would have under calculated by more than half.
*independent* and *nearly*
I'm speaking about a 56% population
The bell curve deals with how humans produced variety. Even in America, the populations act differently. Let me get the graph.
Yeah that's just the clt @You feel safe with an account
you can't always force data into neat concepticons like that, even though it gives the statistician the most leverage