Message from @Hector

Discord ID: 637883140618190848


2019-10-27 05:13:00 UTC  

Mexico is at 88 IQ. Not 90 is looking so hot now.

2019-10-27 05:13:00 UTC  

Pondering thoughts ...

2019-10-27 05:13:37 UTC  

when you stop dating her, tell her it's because of her filthy dad

2019-10-27 05:13:58 UTC  

"it's not you, it's your dad"

2019-10-27 05:13:59 UTC  

Lol

2019-10-27 05:14:04 UTC  

@Hector and Mexico City is actually a decent place. 90iq pod-dwellers are more than enough to prop up the oligarchs

2019-10-27 05:14:26 UTC  

Mexico City is sucking up the intelligence of its satellite cities.

2019-10-27 05:14:35 UTC  

The country looks terrible.

2019-10-27 05:14:48 UTC  

All the high IQ people migrate into the big cities.

2019-10-27 05:14:51 UTC  

Yea, I don't disagree

2019-10-27 05:16:32 UTC  

tsk tsk, @EJGalecio. are you cheating or poly

2019-10-27 05:17:10 UTC  

@Deleted User wait, and you even made several assumptions too that make the situation worse. There a several populations there. I was talking to a friend from Mexico. The Spaniards are about 99 IQ. They are having low birth rates. They make up the rich cities like Mexico. The natives and mixed are like 85 - 80 IQ. >_>

2019-10-27 05:17:30 UTC  

A 90iq nation of 400 million people means around 4 million people with an IQ of 120+
Even to keep a capital going easily

2019-10-27 05:18:08 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/634367565304561675/637882704980869141/immigration-from-mexico-by-municipality-2010.png

2019-10-27 05:18:32 UTC  

socialist heat-map?

2019-10-27 05:18:42 UTC  

Well, you would actually have to break the population into several demographics, each having its own bell curve.

2019-10-27 05:19:09 UTC  

racist

2019-10-27 05:19:10 UTC  

Ok, but I'm talking aggregate 90 lol

2019-10-27 05:19:18 UTC  

So it averages out

2019-10-27 05:19:52 UTC  

You are doing a total bell curve population. IF you average it out, your calculation is wrong.

2019-10-27 05:19:52 UTC  

maintenance in mexico probably isn't the same thing i'm thinking of

2019-10-27 05:19:58 UTC  

he's saying that's inaccurate because of the regional compositions

2019-10-27 05:20:19 UTC  

The SD is what is important. The different populations would have their own SD.

2019-10-27 05:20:35 UTC  

Let me make an example

2019-10-27 05:20:41 UTC  

Wdym? Weak law of large numbers
A bell curve is made up of infinite bell curves

2019-10-27 05:20:49 UTC  

@Naberiusno sir

2019-10-27 05:20:53 UTC  

I never

2019-10-27 05:21:14 UTC  

Central limit theorem as well

2019-10-27 05:21:54 UTC  

we only assume

2019-10-27 05:21:58 UTC  

```in some situations, when independent random variables are added, their properly normalized sum tends toward a normal distribution```

2019-10-27 05:22:45 UTC  

Oof to doubt the empiracy of either is a tall task

2019-10-27 05:22:46 UTC  

Bell curves are not a precise law of nature

2019-10-27 05:23:10 UTC  

The normal distribution is everywhere

2019-10-27 05:23:16 UTC  

empiracy of the distribution of genetic traits on mexico's jungle? i have little experience there

2019-10-27 05:23:30 UTC  

Say there is a population with a IQ average of 100. One population makes 33 million with an IQ average of 120. The other population makes up 67 million. It has an IQ average of 90. You are saying that population groups makes 15 million people with an IQ of 115 and higher. In reality, they have way more.

2019-10-27 05:23:33 UTC  
2019-10-27 05:24:17 UTC  

bell-curves is too christian-centrist...
call them menorah-curves instead.

2019-10-27 05:24:17 UTC  

They would have over 35 million with an IQ over 115.

2019-10-27 05:24:37 UTC  

Get what I am saying @Deleted User .

2019-10-27 05:25:12 UTC  

Ok, that would be true in theory yes
But that's not what we're facing