Message from @You feel safe with an account

Discord ID: 637885774662205441


2019-10-27 05:27:39 UTC  

it's just a theory

2019-10-27 05:28:07 UTC  

You can't add the populations together. It is based of the Law of Independent Assortment.

2019-10-27 05:28:29 UTC  

Bruh, almost everything we know in the domain of social science assumes the legitimacy of that theory
Its a null assumption

2019-10-27 05:28:39 UTC  

it's why social science is shit

2019-10-27 05:28:49 UTC  

^

2019-10-27 05:28:49 UTC  

probably

2019-10-27 05:28:54 UTC  

Biology too then?

2019-10-27 05:29:00 UTC  

pretty much

2019-10-27 05:29:09 UTC  

when it comes to those details

2019-10-27 05:29:10 UTC  

Social science is really shit. You learn more psychology in biology, lmao

2019-10-27 05:29:16 UTC  

How do you think your 23&me works

2019-10-27 05:29:20 UTC  

I'm on day four now

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/634367565304561675/637885524069318676/1K-neaFEEFgDDjo5AGh0dMg.png

2019-10-27 05:29:22 UTC  

<:CHAD:396569198404435969>

2019-10-27 05:29:26 UTC  

there are NO neat bell curves in nature

2019-10-27 05:29:42 UTC  

unless you produce very nice random measurement errors

2019-10-27 05:29:47 UTC  

I never said anything about a perfectly normal distribution

2019-10-27 05:29:53 UTC  

which happen a lot around very strange attractors

2019-10-27 05:30:06 UTC  

that is because of selection processes and environmental factors. Humans do reproduce in a bell curve fashion.

2019-10-27 05:30:09 UTC  

I appealed to the clt
Which is a convergence to the normal distribution

2019-10-27 05:30:10 UTC  

then i'm out of silly things to say

2019-10-27 05:30:20 UTC  

convergence in where the ivory tower?

2019-10-27 05:30:25 UTC  

i was speaking of exactly that

2019-10-27 05:30:31 UTC  

Which all of data analytics assumes,even race science

2019-10-27 05:30:35 UTC  

it doesn't converge in the real world

2019-10-27 05:30:46 UTC  

Dude lmao

2019-10-27 05:30:51 UTC  

I need jf in here

2019-10-27 05:30:56 UTC  

you have to be aware of these assumptions when you poke into the details

2019-10-27 05:31:04 UTC  

@Deleted User are you saying we can add all the genetic populations in say Mexico together and treat them as one bell curve?

2019-10-27 05:31:05 UTC  

it's also why race science is leaky in parts

2019-10-27 05:31:18 UTC  

too much certainty was put in some stats or other

2019-10-27 05:31:43 UTC  

i don't need science to determine racial differences myself

2019-10-27 05:32:09 UTC  

No, I don't believe I ever said that
That's how you find the probabilistic distribution of a single population

2019-10-27 05:33:09 UTC  

But if you doubt the clt or the wlln
Good luck lol
They are the crux of experiment design

2019-10-27 05:33:14 UTC  

Ok, but I'm talking aggregate 90 lol
So it averages out
Wdym? Weak law of large numbers
A bell curve is made up of infinite bell curves
Central limit theorem as well

2019-10-27 05:33:27 UTC  

they literally are the crux, in a bad sense too

2019-10-27 05:33:30 UTC  

>_>

2019-10-27 05:33:40 UTC  

It seemed like you were saying otherwise.

2019-10-27 05:33:41 UTC  

you can support any assumptions with geometry

2019-10-27 05:33:50 UTC  

@Hector yeah, like I said, one mulatto race

2019-10-27 05:35:06 UTC  

Mexico is not just a mulatto race though. There are populations of Spaniards there. There are populations of natives there. There are the mulattos there. It is more complex than that. Spaniards built that country, pure Spaniards.

2019-10-27 05:35:32 UTC  

I'm not talking about mexicoooo