Message from @You feel safe with an account
Discord ID: 637885440980025354
They would have over 35 million with an IQ over 115.
Get what I am saying @Deleted User .
Ok, that would be true in theory yes
But that's not what we're facing
My statement was obviously with built in assumptions
I admit
``` Physical quantities that are expected to be the sum of many independent processes (such as measurement errors) often have distributions that are nearly normal.[3] ```
You would have under calculated by more than half.
*independent* and *nearly*
I'm speaking about a 56% population
The bell curve deals with how humans produced variety. Even in America, the populations act differently. Let me get the graph.
Yeah that's just the clt @You feel safe with an account
you can't always force data into neat concepticons like that, even though it gives the statistician the most leverage
it's just a theory
You can't add the populations together. It is based of the Law of Independent Assortment.
Bruh, almost everything we know in the domain of social science assumes the legitimacy of that theory
Its a null assumption
it's why social science is shit
^
probably
Biology too then?
when it comes to those details
Social science is really shit. You learn more psychology in biology, lmao
How do you think your 23&me works
I'm on day four now
<:CHAD:396569198404435969>
there are NO neat bell curves in nature
unless you produce very nice random measurement errors
I never said anything about a perfectly normal distribution
which happen a lot around very strange attractors
that is because of selection processes and environmental factors. Humans do reproduce in a bell curve fashion.
I appealed to the clt
Which is a convergence to the normal distribution
then i'm out of silly things to say
convergence in where the ivory tower?
i was speaking of exactly that
Which all of data analytics assumes,even race science
it doesn't converge in the real world
Dude lmao
I need jf in here
you have to be aware of these assumptions when you poke into the details
@Deleted User are you saying we can add all the genetic populations in say Mexico together and treat them as one bell curve?