Message from @tienXtreme

Discord ID: 638185787770404905


2019-10-28 01:20:07 UTC  

thats not a counter thats a "wouldnt it be cool if"

2019-10-28 01:20:15 UTC  

but we dont need aliens to explain cambrian explusion

2019-10-28 01:20:23 UTC  

mutations is how we get X-men..
so, necessary for the next step in human evolution

2019-10-28 01:20:23 UTC  

the problem with that is that it just pushes it back one step

2019-10-28 01:20:24 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/634367565304561675/638185263713091584/72149020_1697570480383001_4760372707066190382_n.jpg

2019-10-28 01:20:32 UTC  

Tfw you'll never smell her gooch

2019-10-28 01:20:32 UTC  

show bob

2019-10-28 01:20:37 UTC  

you then have to ask: what causes the aliens to be alive?

2019-10-28 01:20:42 UTC  

god

2019-10-28 01:20:42 UTC  

so it doesn't solve the problem at all

2019-10-28 01:20:49 UTC  

apply occam's razor

2019-10-28 01:20:52 UTC  

and get rid of the aliens

2019-10-28 01:20:59 UTC  

@fuguer he also argues that the likelihood of dependent mutations occurring increases exponentially. Theyve shown that just two gene mutations needed could take 100m - 1b generations to occur successfully

2019-10-28 01:21:03 UTC  

aliens are angels
check mate!

2019-10-28 01:21:07 UTC  

@fuguer how would you prove common descent from a few organisms vs descent from dozens or hundreds of organisms created separately though

2019-10-28 01:21:20 UTC  

me vs duck and nerth

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/634367565304561675/638185499110014986/240.png

2019-10-28 01:21:26 UTC  

<:dab:395562678153904128>

2019-10-28 01:21:57 UTC  

trivially

2019-10-28 01:22:08 UTC  

common descent shows up clearly in the genetics

2019-10-28 01:22:22 UTC  

well, I'll read some rebuttals now, I just finished the book today

2019-10-28 01:22:28 UTC  

How?

2019-10-28 01:22:44 UTC  

it does, not a super straight line as we don't have the dna of extinct shit, but what we have, makes alot of sense @fuguer

2019-10-28 01:22:45 UTC  

There would be a lot of descent from those many common ancestors

2019-10-28 01:22:52 UTC  

like all science, if evolution is true, then we expect to find genetic patterns consistent with it... and every single time we check, we do

2019-10-28 01:23:12 UTC  

well he doesn't deny the progression that has occured

2019-10-28 01:23:16 UTC  

for example, all the organisms might have a broken gene from a past mutation

2019-10-28 01:23:21 UTC  

So how do you know its inconsistent with multiple common ancestors?

2019-10-28 01:23:27 UTC  

he's not saying humans were just created, or that we didn't evolve

2019-10-28 01:23:35 UTC  

if they were all created separately theres no reason to expect them to share the same dysfunctional dna

2019-10-28 01:23:46 UTC  

yes, he doesn't deny we share the same ancestor

2019-10-28 01:23:46 UTC  

but its precisely what we expect with evolution

2019-10-28 01:23:49 UTC  

and we see it time and time again

2019-10-28 01:24:12 UTC  

Are you saying there are super old mutations that 90% of living things have?

2019-10-28 01:24:16 UTC  

yes

2019-10-28 01:24:17 UTC  

all he denies is the way by which new functionality is created

2019-10-28 01:24:34 UTC  

He says it is not through random mutations

2019-10-28 01:24:36 UTC  

again one example just for humans is vitamin C gene

2019-10-28 01:24:55 UTC  

Humans are not 90% of life on earth

2019-10-28 01:24:56 UTC  

we have a PERFECT copy of vitamin c synthesizing gene, but ours is broken, because our primate ancestors had so much fruit they could survive without it

2019-10-28 01:25:16 UTC  

Yes, that's an example of devolution @fuguer

2019-10-28 01:25:17 UTC  

lol