You don't pick Sith. Sith picks you.

Dawkins would be grey Jedi, I assume

In the Star Wars world, the Jedi are anti nature hippie psychopaths.

this guy is like the worst debater ever

you cant debate just asking questions like you're playing 20 questions

then force peopel to answer yes or no to nonsensical questions

I wonder if the jedi also have tunnels under the schools where they hide younglings

His entire argument rested on the belief in God.

They couldn't even get to the evolution part of the debate.

hes the perfect embodiness of what i despise about hardcore christians

even the questions he ask are based implicitly on his religious worldview

does god have red hair?

can you answer yes or no to that

its a nonsense question if you dont accept god

in science we speak of hypotheses, and we falsify them

Jedis were non reproductive entities that wanted to suppress all human feeling.

god's bald

we NEVER speak of universal truths

in logic some statements are neither true or false

some are indeterminate, some are true but unprovably so

Explain an unprovable truth
It seems universalistic to me

You can look up Goedel's Incompleteness Theorem, Godel sentence, Tarski's undefinability theorem, and Turing and Church's work.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del%27s_incompleteness_theorems#Truth_of_the_G%C3%B6del_sentence

Hmm
Thanks

basically you can create statements so complex they cant be proven true or false, ever

but they can nevertheless definitely be true or false

the thing is,
it is within the real of possibility that there is a creator god, who "started the machine" essentially flicked a switch and lit the big bang, let the universe unroll etc..
That still doesn't mean that the christian god is the one who did it..
Cthulhu is as probably as yahweh

Right

and if god exists and created the universe, then evolution could be his mechanism for creation

i dont see a necessary contradiction

These concepts are all closely related, Russell's set paradox, Richard's paradox, liar's paradox.

if you can have logical paradoxes, you can have unprovably true statements.

It's also mathematically equivalent to the halting problem (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halting_problem)

The halting problem means, if you have the code for a program, can you guarantee if it will finish in finite time or run forever

And Turing proved its not possible.

These problems are beautiful because theyre all the same problem seen a different way

a logical symmetry if you will

ConvertEveryoneToIslam.exe

that programwill finish in finite time

with the death of the human race

Infidel