Message from @Nerthulas
Discord ID: 638923460797530123
no, chinese are not @#$%%^$^#ers
The same nonsense as in the genetic determinist nonsense.
that's not nonsense wtf
It absolutely is
A. that the chinese were as poor as uncontacted sub-saharan african tribes, B. that in the minds of westerners at the time (this itself is a vague claim) that chinese were 'the same' as africans
Communist that doesn't believe in biology?
Imagine my shock
Lets starve together
The human race
@Nerthulas these are inventions of your own mind that you are putting in my mouth.
one society had civilization and the other did not
@iippo, hey explain to me how genes explain the rise of China.
yeah, science is important, except evolution
ignore that
one group of people had high G potential the other did not
it doesn't fit the narrative
China is not comparable to Sub-Saharan africa lmfao
really? Why was China so fucking poor then?
it was only relatively poor
Did their g potential take a nap for an instance?
cause there weren't jews to make them rich
It "wasn't"
(((rich)))
@BabygottBach the Proto-indo-iranians
china has never been sub saharan africa poor
compared to Japan and the west
for 5000 years
chinese and africans both steal
Damn, you don't know jackshit about China, do you?
they needed capitalism and democracy
what is going on
of course China has never been as poor as Sub-Saharan africa
what a ridiculous statement
China was incredibly poor.
that's not even controversial to say
relative
what is relativity