Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 638925057535508510
@Nerthulas. nice moving of the goal posts. I'm not talking about development. I'm talking about wealth.
South africa used to be a nuclear power in fact
The wealth of nations
Comes from one source
buh buh booty
China had become incredibly poor by the time of the Xinhai revolution.
Now according to you, this is due to genes.
I use development and wealth interchangeably, besides, China wouldn't pass the standard for poverty in terms of wealth either
So when China becomes the largest economy today, this is ALSO due to genes.
they had their own state
foreign genes get it right city gayboi
they could levy taxes
China, in 1900, wouldn't pass the
holy shit
not a comparable situation
If a nation is poor once. No that’s not genes. If a nation has always been poor since the beginning of time. Genes are a valid hypothesis
China in 1900 was ***fucking rich***
Do you KNOW how many Chinese peasants were starving to death every year in China pre revolution?
God you're just bullshitting now.
compared to most of the world for most of history
cocaine being legal
again
lol, get some historical perspective
Ad hominem
You lost
Chinese life expectancy was literally in the 30s
that's rich?
Are you kidding me?
Mean or median life expectancy
so development =/= wealth, but life expectancy = wealth?
it doesn't matter if the peasants are dying, peasants die, that doesn't mean that the country isn't rich
lol
How?
life expectancy is not wealth. the wealthy still got mercury "cures" back in the day
urban poverty is something distinct from never having developed enough technology or infrastructure to even have cities
Mean life expectancy of 30s means famine. That’s not a situation that can last
I don't know why you keep going back to this issue of infrastruccture.
The Chinese aren't human