Message from @BabygottBach
Discord ID: 638924582010486794
'China was just slightly ahead of Africa at the time'
lmfao
unless u want to be brown maxim
poor is a poor choice to measure a people
okay buddy
like baby is extremely gay
i want to talk to russians again
Yes, study some fucking history please.
What was the Taiping Rebellion
lol, you lost fren?
what were the Opium Wars?
He is
What was the boxer rebellion?
a society which had developed civilization 9000 years previously was 'just ahead' of a society which had never developed civilization
bud
Opium wars were when China tried to force Britain to buy opium
Shameful
if you're ***having*** rebellions, you're at a certain level of development
At one point under colonialism, Africa had some of the high developed cities in the world
which is ***far*** ahead of that of sub-saharan africa
this is a joke
@Nerthulas. nice moving of the goal posts. I'm not talking about development. I'm talking about wealth.
South africa used to be a nuclear power in fact
The wealth of nations
Comes from one source
buh buh booty
China had become incredibly poor by the time of the Xinhai revolution.
Now according to you, this is due to genes.
I use development and wealth interchangeably, besides, China wouldn't pass the standard for poverty in terms of wealth either
So when China becomes the largest economy today, this is ALSO due to genes.
they had their own state
foreign genes get it right city gayboi
they could levy taxes
China, in 1900, wouldn't pass the
holy shit
not a comparable situation
If a nation is poor once. No that’s not genes. If a nation has always been poor since the beginning of time. Genes are a valid hypothesis