Message from @fuguer
Discord ID: 638925746789941279
so development =/= wealth, but life expectancy = wealth?
it doesn't matter if the peasants are dying, peasants die, that doesn't mean that the country isn't rich
lol
How?
life expectancy is not wealth. the wealthy still got mercury "cures" back in the day
urban poverty is something distinct from never having developed enough technology or infrastructure to even have cities
Mean life expectancy of 30s means famine. That’s not a situation that can last
I don't know why you keep going back to this issue of infrastruccture.
The Chinese aren't human
costs $$$
Eventually people starve and life expectancy rises
infrastructure is capital
@fuguer, China was pretty much experiencing faming constantly around that time.
built up by the imperialist colonialists in Africa, I suppose?
if you have millions of urban people to have starve, you're already at a certain level of development
The Chinese treat their own like robots
aka wealth
I’d have to study the cause or ask my wife
which the sub-saharans never reached
My OP to you was to explain the difference between the Chinese and African experience of the 20th century.
Now according to you, the white saviors came into Africa and built it all up.
simple, China had a civilization and Africa did not
If you are a hapa , you are half non human
ancient depiction of Hercules
clearly a Black man
what is going in the pic?
Chinese culture or civilization is not the ultimate explanation.
What’s the ultimate explanation
breeders in civilization select traits that are good for civilization, over the course of thousands of years this makes people amongst these civilizations better prepared for a society. Policy can be made by civilization to speed this up, but this takes generations. Plus, the fact that sub-saharan africans were cut off from the rest of the world kept them from spreading information. explain this:
yeah sure, 9000 years of capital development makes no difference
@Nerthulas, explain how culture led China to be so poor to begin with.
an advanced state system and a high-iq population makes no difference
where were the 9000 years of capital development during the stagnation of the Qing?
it is only you who is saying that China is poor
hey, how did you KNOW china's pop back then had high IQ?
we know china had civilization
they were ***relatively*** poor
Where are your empirical studies for that?