Message from @BabygottBach
Discord ID: 638985442259370027
him
when these genes occur, they correlate to higher IQ
that's what it is
@Markomann hes terribly confused
it doesn't matter race
it matters the genes
@Markomann Chinese Marxist
he admitted genetic differences earlier now is back to arguing against it
would cause me to disbelieve twin studies showing that people with the same genome in very different environments show similar results
can you explain that to me
Ameri-nese Marxist
the frequency genes occur, is how we determine race
in any specie
sorry, I got the wrong article
that cluster
`Estimates of the total heritability of human traits assume the absence of epistasis, which has been called the "assumption of additivity". Although some researchers have cited such estimates in support of the existence of "missing heritability" unaccounted for by known genetic loci, the assumption of additivity may render these estimates invalid.[12] There is also some empirical evidence that the additivity assumption is frequently violated in behavior genetic studies of adolescent intelligence and academic achievement.[13]`
there are genetic bottlenecks
where a few families end up making the whole population
babygottbach i dont really understand what you are ultimately arguing
you dramatically change the gene pool that way
@BabygottBach why is the assumption of additivity necessary?
are you trying to tell us that children dont inherit genes from their parents?
I don't know, @Nerthulas
that's a simple way groups will difer by time
there
discussion over
I don't understand the statistical measures of heritability to understand why
can you explain why twins perform similarly in different environments if heritability of IQ is bullshit?
He's calling things into question unjustifiably
Some funky sociological mechanism
That quote he just posted is shit
I'm fully justified
It's not even making a counter claim
how is it not?