Message from @Banjod
Discord ID: 638985282904915979
yes, you literally do
lmao
Zero
Nope
You don't know what causes your toothbrush to get wet
You are demanding of me exact sociological mechanisms, yet you don't have the molecular pathway
As a matter of fact
you're making an argument equivalent to "if you don't know what each part of a car does, it doesn't drive"
we don't need to know
@BabygottBach I don't see this page on assumptions that you're talking about
You are philosophically ignorant. That's one reason you've fallen to shitlibbery
and if I found it I wouldn't be convinced of anything
you need to explain to me
why this paper
him
when these genes occur, they correlate to higher IQ
that's what it is
@Markomann hes terribly confused
it doesn't matter race
@Markomann Chinese Marxist
he admitted genetic differences earlier now is back to arguing against it
would cause me to disbelieve twin studies showing that people with the same genome in very different environments show similar results
can you explain that to me
Ameri-nese Marxist
the frequency genes occur, is how we determine race
in any specie
sorry, I got the wrong article
that cluster
it's the general heritability
`Estimates of the total heritability of human traits assume the absence of epistasis, which has been called the "assumption of additivity". Although some researchers have cited such estimates in support of the existence of "missing heritability" unaccounted for by known genetic loci, the assumption of additivity may render these estimates invalid.[12] There is also some empirical evidence that the additivity assumption is frequently violated in behavior genetic studies of adolescent intelligence and academic achievement.[13]`
there are genetic bottlenecks
where a few families end up making the whole population
babygottbach i dont really understand what you are ultimately arguing
you dramatically change the gene pool that way
@BabygottBach why is the assumption of additivity necessary?