Message from @Nerthulas
Discord ID: 638987505261215744
that's dishonest
`The exponential fall in genome sequencing costs led to the use of GWAS studies which could simultaneously examine all candidate-genes in larger samples than the original finding, where the candidate-gene hits were found to almost always be false positives and only 2-6% replicate;[7][8][`
😄
Have you addressed this passage?
@BabygottBach
Epistasis is biologically real but generally insignificant for selection purposes
https://t.co/tPjSuuDw13?amp=1
The replicability of sociology was brought up
But genetics also has this problem
how can anyone possibly cope
Smart parents have better SES to pass to their kids because they are smart @BabygottBach Classic example that correlation does not equal causation
tapirs have the largest pecker
one for the hall of retard
GWAS was replaced with GCTA which found that the traits were highly polygenic @BabygottBach
so yes I've addressed it I think three times now
`Lewontin claims that equation (1′)(1′) above presents the most accurate picture of the contributions to phenotypic variance. He goes on to argue that VI,VG×EVI,VG×E and COV(G,E)COV(G,E) are not negligible. In fact, he argues that these are always part and parcel of the variance in traits. As a result, apportioning the phenotypic variance between genes and environment is no easy matter and standard analyses of variance simply cannot come up with useful and informative values for h2bhb2 and h2h2. `
soft science lol
Listen, yo. Maybe there are neuron elves which help on IQ tests in some environments and not others. So we've got to toss out all your highly correlated genetic IQ data.
Sociology TM
"reading to your kids makes smart kids", or it's just the fact that smart parents read to their kids that inherit their intelligence
I know a lot of stupid people who read novels like crazy
@BabygottBach that quote is meaningless without context
`Finally, VPVP can be effected by non-random correlations between genotypes and environments referred to as gene-environment covariation, COV(G,E)COV(G,E). For example, if plants with a genotype that tends to produce large plants also select nutrient- rich environments and plants with a genotype that tends to produce small plants also select nutrient- poor environments, the variance in height would be increased. If the relation was switched the variance would decrease (Futuyma 1998). `
I still would like you to explain why twins keep performing similarly across measures and studies @BabygottBach
there's that @Deleted User
@BabygottBach Blacks underperform whites worldwide
@Nerthulas, I'm not familiar with the sociological research on this matter.
Let's try them in the vacuum of space
Nigga I can't understand these snippets of a paper without the context
So you trust it with no knowledge?
What's the replicability rate of the GCTA?
@Deleted User, nope
@BabygottBach get in vc
ok but the environments are different so why are the twins performing the same across measures and studies @BabygottBach
I dont trust either side with no knowledge
can you please explain this to me
At this glance, it seems like there's a huge debate between two camps
I just want you to explain why the twins perform the same
Do you think parents treat twins exactly the same?
The overarching point is that there are variances and I don't give a fuck exactly how they exist 😆
Sociology TM
well, its consistent across all measures and studies