Lmao

Sociology has a huge body of evidence that IQ is social

@Deleted User, so does genetics

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missing_heritability_problem

(((huge body of evidence)))

we've addressed this please stop posting it

that's dishonest

`The exponential fall in genome sequencing costs led to the use of GWAS studies which could simultaneously examine all candidate-genes in larger samples than the original finding, where the candidate-gene hits were found to almost always be false positives and only 2-6% replicate;[7][8][`

😄

Have you addressed this passage?

@BabygottBach

Epistasis is biologically real but generally insignificant for selection purposes
https://t.co/tPjSuuDw13?amp=1

The replicability of sociology was brought up

But genetics also has this problem

how can anyone possibly cope

Smart parents have better SES to pass to their kids because they are smart @BabygottBach Classic example that correlation does not equal causation

tapirs have the largest pecker

one for the hall of retard

GWAS was replaced with GCTA which found that the traits were highly polygenic @BabygottBach

so yes I've addressed it I think three times now

`Lewontin claims that equation (1′)(1′) above presents the most accurate picture of the contributions to phenotypic variance. He goes on to argue that VI,VG×EVI,VG×E and COV(G,E)COV(G,E) are not negligible. In fact, he argues that these are always part and parcel of the variance in traits. As a result, apportioning the phenotypic variance between genes and environment is no easy matter and standard analyses of variance simply cannot come up with useful and informative values for h2bhb2 and h2h2. `

soft science lol

Listen, yo. Maybe there are neuron elves which help on IQ tests in some environments and not others. So we've got to toss out all your highly correlated genetic IQ data.

Sociology TM

"reading to your kids makes smart kids", or it's just the fact that smart parents read to their kids that inherit their intelligence

I know a lot of stupid people who read novels like crazy

@BabygottBach that quote is meaningless without context

lol

`Finally, VPVP can be effected by non-random correlations between genotypes and environments referred to as gene-environment covariation, COV(G,E)COV(G,E). For example, if plants with a genotype that tends to produce large plants also select nutrient- rich environments and plants with a genotype that tends to produce small plants also select nutrient- poor environments, the variance in height would be increased. If the relation was switched the variance would decrease (Futuyma 1998). `

I still would like you to explain why twins keep performing similarly across measures and studies @BabygottBach

there's that @Deleted User

@BabygottBach Blacks underperform whites worldwide

@Nerthulas, I'm not familiar with the sociological research on this matter.

Let's try them in the vacuum of space

Nigga I can't understand these snippets of a paper without the context

So you trust it with no knowledge?

What's the replicability rate of the GCTA?

@Deleted User, nope

@BabygottBach get in vc

ok but the environments are different so why are the twins performing the same across measures and studies @BabygottBach

I dont trust either side with no knowledge

can you please explain this to me