so he must have other sourcews

Some anthropologists believe in the hypothesis of a so-called Southern Route or the idea that Aboriginal Australians descended from an early wave of dispersal of modern humans through Southern Asia. Most other population groups outside Africa are, according to this theory, descendants of a separate, more recent wave of dispersal. But others believe there was only one major wave. It has also been hotly debated if Aboriginals living in Australia today descend from the modern humans we know were in this area 50,000 years ago.

or be reading their sources

why is josh neal countersignalling fuentes

what a fag

holy fuck

because josh neal is a brainlet

look at this

oh nvm, i thought that dude was still here

it makes so much more sense that they were part of a first wave

tbh

yeah

homo erectus

homo blacktus

they're indians

this is the location of that phenotype

what are yalls thoughts on this
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/05/22/europe-birthplace-mankind-not-africa-scientists-find/

I knew

I recognize them from the island video

i know where andaman islands are

thats where the sentinelese live

thats what the sentinel islanders look like

you think if they were indians theyd still be uncontacted?

they'd be chatting up women on the ships

asking them out

but they're supposedly closer to us than to bantu

and looking for new places to po

poo

its not that relevant to compare how close they are to bantu

theres many african groups

there really wasn't a birth place

Wow, there's quite a bit of phenotypic variance between native Australian populations.

I never knew.

Nick's crew wrecked Charlie Kirk's Q&A

i always assumed the human looking ones had some admixture

Beautifully brutal

iuve been to australia and met real abos

theyre more like animals than humans

when they beg from you it feels more like a dog is following you than a human

Vincent james covered some of Kirk's stuff. WTF kind of Mossad op is he