Message from @Dutch

Discord ID: 639021605929877514


2019-10-30 08:41:22 UTC  

they could be some remnants of the very first outward migration

2019-10-30 08:41:28 UTC  

with indian admixture

2019-10-30 08:41:40 UTC  

These genes could not have arrived during the initial migration to Australia 40,000 years ago because they are absent from the New Guinean and Mamanwa genomes. Also, they are too uniformly spread across northern Aboriginal genomes to have come from European colonists.

2019-10-30 08:41:58 UTC  

the vedic admixture in abos came afterwards

2019-10-30 08:42:03 UTC  

so imagine what they were like before that

2019-10-30 08:42:04 UTC  

jesus

2019-10-30 08:42:10 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/634367565304561675/639021216400801802/unknown.png

2019-10-30 08:42:22 UTC  

i wonder why indians are so insanely hairy

2019-10-30 08:42:26 UTC  

living in a hot climate

2019-10-30 08:42:37 UTC  

i saw this indian guy take off his shirt, and he was like basically a gorilla

2019-10-30 08:42:42 UTC  

One of God's sick jokes.

2019-10-30 08:43:05 UTC  

ok if the vedic mixture came later

2019-10-30 08:43:09 UTC  

what were they before?

2019-10-30 08:43:20 UTC  

african migration + denisovan

2019-10-30 08:43:27 UTC  

Which is also funny because you have some Sino-Tibetan populations with basically no body hair.

2019-10-30 08:43:28 UTC  

They wuz Aryan before.

2019-10-30 08:43:30 UTC  

but they're not related to africans closely

2019-10-30 08:43:32 UTC  

that's confirmed

2019-10-30 08:43:35 UTC  

But unironically.

2019-10-30 08:43:36 UTC  

so

2019-10-30 08:43:43 UTC  

i am back

2019-10-30 08:43:49 UTC  

the hairiness is the thickness and color of the hair

2019-10-30 08:43:53 UTC  

and the skin color

2019-10-30 08:44:10 UTC  

and i don't even know why my account was removed from this server in the first place

2019-10-30 08:44:14 UTC  

DNA analysis of a 90-year-old hair sample reveals that Aboriginal Australians left Africa much earlier than Europeans and East Asians

2019-10-30 08:44:24 UTC  

theyre a completely different migration out of africa

2019-10-30 08:44:26 UTC  

not part of our group

2019-10-30 08:44:44 UTC  

"does this mean we're more black than them"

2019-10-30 08:44:45 UTC  

shit

2019-10-30 08:44:50 UTC  

wtf

2019-10-30 08:44:59 UTC  

@Nerthulas What site are you using for those pics?

2019-10-30 08:45:08 UTC  

humanphenotypes

2019-10-30 08:45:13 UTC  

.net

2019-10-30 08:45:14 UTC  

lol

2019-10-30 08:45:17 UTC  

you haven't seen it?

2019-10-30 08:45:22 UTC  

its like our favorite site

2019-10-30 08:45:26 UTC  

because of BasedChris

2019-10-30 08:45:27 UTC  

The first genome analysis of an Aborigine reveals that these early Australians took part in the first human migration out of Africa. They were the first to arrive in Asia some 70,000 years ago, roaming the area at least 24,000 years before the ancestors of present-day Europeans and Asians. They were also the first to live in Australia, according to DNA results of a 90-year-old hair sample of a young man that link Aborigines to the first inhabitants of this part of the world about 50,000 years ago.

This study, however, is not the first to contradict the popular theory that modern humans came from a single out-of-Africa migration wave into Europe, Asia, and Australia. But it does deal it a huge blow by confirming that Aboriginal Australians took part in the first of two rounds of human relocation.

2019-10-30 08:45:42 UTC  

I've seen Chris use it extensively, but I never knew the actual site.

2019-10-30 08:46:04 UTC