because they started out as africans and didnt change

maybe they were driven out by more evolved tribes

forced to flee

I think the vedics were part of our group

They actually look a lot like some South Indians

not africans

why do africans look like africans

i dont think they were vedics

@Banjod They don't.

the paper said there was indian geneflow to australia after the initial migration

they could be some remnants of the very first outward migration

with indian admixture

These genes could not have arrived during the initial migration to Australia 40,000 years ago because they are absent from the New Guinean and Mamanwa genomes. Also, they are too uniformly spread across northern Aboriginal genomes to have come from European colonists.

the vedic admixture in abos came afterwards

so imagine what they were like before that

jesus

i wonder why indians are so insanely hairy

living in a hot climate

i saw this indian guy take off his shirt, and he was like basically a gorilla

One of God's sick jokes.

ok if the vedic mixture came later

what were they before?

african migration + denisovan

Which is also funny because you have some Sino-Tibetan populations with basically no body hair.

They wuz Aryan before.

but they're not related to africans closely

that's confirmed

But unironically.

so

i am back

the hairiness is the thickness and color of the hair

and the skin color

https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2011/09/aborigines-the-first-out-of-africa-the-first-in-asia-and-australia/245392/

and i don't even know why my account was removed from this server in the first place

DNA analysis of a 90-year-old hair sample reveals that Aboriginal Australians left Africa much earlier than Europeans and East Asians

theyre a completely different migration out of africa

not part of our group

"does this mean we're more black than them"

shit

wtf