All the globalist literature has talked about this since the 19th Century

You need to do some reading

You can't come to a kneejerk assessment

I can't have my view of what I would do?

Population isn't the issue. 500 mil globally is fine.

It's the genetic control that is disgusting.

Started with Malthus, I'd say

no, you want to lower the population a lot

Insofar as I'm aware

like a few million

No Ban

In BNW the world leaders were even described as having long noses lmao.

Because you come to utilitarian assessments w/o a lot of history most of the time

I'm tell you that you can't do that in this case

So

I don't need "history"

Brave New World is a much better parallel than 1984

this is what I would do

it's the correct action

There's a level of honest discourse on overpopulation in these circles

Then there's a level of *dishonest*, justification seeking discourse on overpopulation in these circles

There are perfectly ethical ways to lower population.

of course

they're already lowering it

and trying to

Ziocuck above

You can't come to an appreciation or personal judgement on the ratio of that until you go through a lot of their writings

mumbo jumbo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OC5L6YF2iAs

I don't need to read some old book to understand what I would do

Suffice it to say, their entire justification for Brave New World, global government, total government control, genetic engineering, etc... has been most prominently *overpopulation*

The Second big reason, which they don't talk about as much now, was ***bomb almighty***

The owners of GE firms will be the only humans in the future. Watch them all be 3rd cousins with small hats.

So when then the hydrogen bomb was developed, that became their rallying cry for one world govt

GE firms?

"If we only have one govt. there's no need or change for us to war with one another and thus use hydrogen weapons on one another."

Genetic engineering.

That's still around, but not as prevalent now.

So

Malthus said we would run out of food, long ago

Wouldn't be able to keep up with a much lower pop. than we have now

Don't remember the numbers