this is what I would do

it's the correct action

There's a level of honest discourse on overpopulation in these circles

Then there's a level of *dishonest*, justification seeking discourse on overpopulation in these circles

There are perfectly ethical ways to lower population.

of course

they're already lowering it

and trying to

Ziocuck above

You can't come to an appreciation or personal judgement on the ratio of that until you go through a lot of their writings

mumbo jumbo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OC5L6YF2iAs

I don't need to read some old book to understand what I would do

Suffice it to say, their entire justification for Brave New World, global government, total government control, genetic engineering, etc... has been most prominently *overpopulation*

The Second big reason, which they don't talk about as much now, was ***bomb almighty***

The owners of GE firms will be the only humans in the future. Watch them all be 3rd cousins with small hats.

So when then the hydrogen bomb was developed, that became their rallying cry for one world govt

GE firms?

"If we only have one govt. there's no need or change for us to war with one another and thus use hydrogen weapons on one another."

Genetic engineering.

That's still around, but not as prevalent now.

So

Malthus said we would run out of food, long ago

Wouldn't be able to keep up with a much lower pop. than we have now

Don't remember the numbers

But he was way off

We innovated in agriculture a lot

It's morphed since then

Obviously we are now at Global Warming and Climate Change

These are the codes for overpopulation

And the justification for global government

If you read the Globalist propagandists, they talk about purposefully cooking up narrative and promoting it on scales hardly imaginable and over generations that generate global level threats

That's the key

Global level threats logically lead to global level solutions

That ultimately culminating in global government

Climate weirding

Fake noos

@TheUserNameofPeace do you see technological advancement necessarily leading towards global governance?

It's difficult to prevent

So

These guys, being at the top of the power pyramid for at least hundreds of years, since industrialization at least, saw that global communication plus global transport, these getting better and cheaper at an accelerating rate, would unstoppably lead us to globalism