Message from @ComradeMarcusAureliusStoicGang
Discord ID: 645463597719486474
I would, but I'm tired of seeing your sister all the time
so taxonomically we consider dog breed subspecies?
Just looking at subspecies classifications, some are as small as "these two species are identical except in ear shape"
Yek is about to do some mental gymnastics to justify his claim. Watch this.
i thought that wasnt the case
I swear to god, if you've written a 5 minute text and not answering if he's chinese @Yek
This arguement is trash man. im sorry. I said this before but I'll say it again. Humans cant cluster humans into a subspecies. Subspecies have a defined set of genetic differentiation of a population. Humans dont meet that criteria. Simple as. Phenotypical adaptations in humans account for little of the human genome.
Race differences are even bigger and more noticeable than that.
@Rody Le Cid hag i do t have sisters
BUT
last time I will ask
That guy is hot.
yes hes in africa
can you just write yes or no
you don't have to write 5 minutes
WE DEMAND BBC
GIVE US BBC
WE WANT THE BBC
cringe
The leaf asked for BBC!
again @Yek, race or species has nothing to do with the deviation percentage of the genome
<:peek:396543715587391491>
is the criteria for subspecies purely based the way things look or is it more based on genetic variation
It's based off of any difference that can be noticed.
isnt it based on isolataion and variation in the genome or something
idk
Is it a chinese?
is it a chinese?
is it a chinese?
i mean we dont call dog breeds subspecies?
IS IT A CHINK
the answer. NO. How do you know, because of morphological differences, created by isolated breeding.
there done
you keep coming back to how it has to deviate by a certain percentage or else it's not a sub-species,
well then how much does it have to deviate to be considered different?
WHAT'S THE MAGIC NUMBER?