@Deleted User There is one problem with your axiom. You can't coherently define a "native" ethnic group. For example, who are the "native" English?

no other race have really shown the capacity of whites

@James Peterson YES YOU CAN

@Angry. Do it.

This is so jewish

Define what a native English person us

is*

“Oh you can’t really exactly precisely define this”

I DONT CARE about the native English theyre disgusting

we have the genetic data

what is white?

why wouldn't we be able..

baby don't hurt me

don't hurt me, no more

I agree what white is..

If you say that

You do NOT know what white is

its a mixture of neolithic/brythonic and germanic

But obviously...you guys are ethnic nationalists, not racial ones I guess?

Oh no no no

You guys want France for the French, England for the English etc

Lmao

you take what yhou can get

France for French, English for English yeah

America is a white area though

Why wouldn’t you be ethno nationalist?

Fuck this race mixing bullshit

because it's over for sweden

Globohomo shit

<:rambo:626456459835605014>

because if a frenchman moves to england and lives there its no problem

if you're offended by that...

You lost social credits for that @Nerthulas

I mean it can be friction-inducing

but someone from further away will be less acceptable

genetically

@Nerthulas And why would it be a problem if say...an Askhenazi Jew did So? Or an East Asian?

Yes you're right I don't do this I select in grp based on preferences it's not hard to do so, so of course I am selecting against ppl outside of my race as for ethnic nationalism it's easy to view from the perspective of heritage even if their is much genetic cross over.

like I said, further away

BRUHHHHHHHH

@James Peterson because of THE GENETIC DIFFERENCE