and allowing the state to take from you the pleasure of executing a pedo is immoral

nerth is a closet moral realist <:smug:639989438285611010>

@Ozpin88 Violence in response to violence is okay.

Pedophilia is consuming future genetic capital (consuming the ability of a future generation to pair-bond). Libertarians can't conceive of a commons (everything must be private), so obviously it escapes them how a polity exacting retribution for the consumption of their commons (as described above) is " violence, bad, or can be done without"

nah he's open

He's closeted because he doesn't know the source yet

Nerth is a Protestant who wants to be an atheist bc he is libtarded

oh right 😉

think of the precedent that it creates: apply it to other things, start with snuff films

With a species less predatory than homo sapiens sapiens maybe. As is, violence is necessary to stop this filth

now watching a snuff film is immoral

wrong

we are moving out of the territory of libertarian morality at this point

https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/237273720723472385/652518454028664866/1575599098848.jpg

libertarians can conceive of commons in so far as they voluntarily agree to it

You don't need to agree though

you just have shit parents

and are afraid of family life

You're part of it already, agreement isn't needed

then prepare for war

You're part of a certain genetic stock with certain evolutionary strategies

you ***want*** to be able to say that consuming CP is immoral under a libertarian system is immoral but it just isn't

Libertarians

More like

Liberians

no

I have to go rn...

They coalesce by mutual defense into sovereing bodies of law (which can be a state or something else)

🇱🇷

culture is implied set of morals inherent in the life of the individual wether he likes it or not.

And you're part of them you liking, agreeing, or not

libertarians? More like retards

Libertarian morality would allow anyone to reject pedos. Libertarian morality is pro-discrimination.

consuming child pornography is immoral because children don't consent

well it is kind of a touchy subject...
imagine an anime where there's loli pron...
it's just a pencil/paper drawing, so there isn't any victim,
but even so, it would be kind of disturbing to watch and could possibly even encourage that kind of behavior

if you have a child pornography farm at home you will get killed

he's pulling a mollyjew

It's because the parents don't consent

They're going to kill you not the children, after all

Commons would exist under Libertarianism. The most successful commons are ones with strict moral and ethical standards.

Yeah and how do you enforce them?