Message from @Billy Ray
Discord ID: 652546698932912131
they also punish underage reproduction
Why does that matter?
@Nerthulas It's a precedent literally any private actor would set.
cringe and antinatalismpilled
yes, because people aren't morally broken like libertarians are
that's why most people would set that
Lmao
No
lmao
yes
Yes
True
Nerth wins
<:Yes:639977935209627658>
Private communities, when left to their own devices, will discriminate against pedos.
descriptive statement not a normative statement
everyone discriminates against pedos
what will happen is not in question here, only what is immoral
weabs doesn't understand the concept of morality
the consumption of CP is not immoral under an axiomatically libertarian system, and making it so would pretty much collapse a libertarian system
nerth is a closet moral realist <:smug:639989438285611010>
@Ozpin88 Violence in response to violence is okay.
Pedophilia is consuming future genetic capital (consuming the ability of a future generation to pair-bond). Libertarians can't conceive of a commons (everything must be private), so obviously it escapes them how a polity exacting retribution for the consumption of their commons (as described above) is " violence, bad, or can be done without"
nah he's open
He's closeted because he doesn't know the source yet
Nerth is a Protestant who wants to be an atheist bc he is libtarded
oh right 😉
think of the precedent that it creates: apply it to other things, start with snuff films
With a species less predatory than homo sapiens sapiens maybe. As is, violence is necessary to stop this filth
now watching a snuff film is immoral
wrong
we are moving out of the territory of libertarian morality at this point
libertarians can conceive of commons in so far as they voluntarily agree to it
You don't need to agree though
you just have shit parents
and are afraid of family life
You're part of it already, agreement isn't needed
then prepare for war
You're part of a certain genetic stock with certain evolutionary strategies