Occam's Razor is a probabilistic tool.

not always but often

It's not definitive.

someone explain why banjod experiences salt from christians when he shows them they are stupid, can't think, are christ cucks, and deserve ridicule and being laughed at. He's very puzzled and needs an answer. PLEASE HELP!

Being probably correct is not qualitatively better than being wrong.

Christians using Last Tuesdayism to excuse faulty history

<:steflol:561214382181318656>

It is only marginally better for lack of the option to actually be correct.

<:pepekek:649611550809653248>

Basically, likelihood is like varying degrees of being wrong.

for sure

aqua

Always inferior to certainty.

but it's a probability

there's more probability

that the earth is very old

than not

simple as

science is never absolute

Yes. But because the possibility remains always open that it isn't the case, Occam's Razor is just a tool of convenience.

Not one of accuracy.

So if we want to know The Truth™

i dont understand

We aren't obliged to use it, though we often do otherwise.

science is probabilistic

it's never the truth

And that's a strike against it

show me a magic jew now

no

not at all

and I'll "believe"

it's just the nature of it

of our world

sure you could say it's a strike against science

but eveyrhting is like that except for mathematics

im a magic jew

there's no point in this sterile debate

It may be necessarily so rather than contingently so, but that still does not make probability of accuracy better than certainty of accuracy.

It's a natural flaw.

are you a virgin by any chance aqua?